Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36828772›Full record

ArticleTrends in cancer2023

The unequal burden of time toxicity.

Whitney V Johnson, Anne H Blaes, Christopher M Booth, Ishani Ganguli, Arjun Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Time toxicity in cancer care: a systematic review of definitions and measurement methods.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Cancer patients' experiences of "time toxicity": a qualitative meta-synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Patient-, care partner-, and clinician-proposed solutions to address the time toxicity of cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Whitney V JohnsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Anne H BlaesDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Christopher M BoothDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Ishani GanguliDivision of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Arjun GuptaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: arjgupta@umn.edu.

Funding

The Role of Virtual Care in Improving Primary Care Access and Continuity for At-Risk Multimorbid Older AdultsK23AG068240 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GANGULI, ISHANI · 2021 to 2025
$842k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG068240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many cancer treatments impose large time investments on patients. We have termed these time burdens 'time toxicity' and have urged their consideration as adverse events of treatment. Here, we discuss time toxicity measures while considering inequitable access to healthcare, time as a resource, and patterns of time toxicity.

Indexed as

healthcare equityhealthcare qualityoncologysocial determinants of healthtime toxicity

Identifiers

PMID36828772
PMCPMC10616757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.