Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36828641›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open diabetes research & care2023

Association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a Mendelian randomization study.

Cheng-Chieh Lin, Chia-Ing Li, Chiu-Shong Liu, Li-Na Liao, Chuan-Wei Yang, Chih-Hsueh Lin, Shing-Yu Yang, Tsai-Chung Li

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng-Chieh LinSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chia-Ing LiSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chiu-Shong LiuSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Li-Na LiaoDepartment of Public Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chuan-Wei YangDepartment of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chih-Hsueh LinSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Shing-Yu YangDepartment of Public Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Tsai-Chung LiDepartment of Public Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan tcli@mail.cmu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0002-3346-7462
China Medical University · TWAsia University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObservational studies support the relationship between C-reactive protein (CRP) level and diabetic nephropathy (DN) in patients with diabetes. The research question regarding whether the relationship between serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level and DN is causal lacks experimental evidence. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the causality between hsCRP and DN based on Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA total of 2332 participants with type 2 diabetes from the Taiwan Biobank database was analyzed. Genetic risk scores (GRSs), which comprise four validated CRP loci as two instrumental variables, were calculated as unweighted and weighted scores to evaluate the causal relationship of hsCRP with DN risk. The two-stage regression model was used to estimate OR and 95% CI.

resultsThe analyses of the observational study showed that the hsCRP level was significantly associated with DN after multivariate adjustment (adjusted OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.32). Unweighted/weighted GRSs for log-transformed hsCRP satisfied MR assumptions 1 and 3, respectively; that is, a significant association with hsCRP was observed but that with DN was absent (adjusted OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.09; 1.00, 0.72 to 1.39, respectively). The MR analyses demonstrated that a 1-unit increase in the log-transformed genetically predicted hsCRP by unweighted and weighted GRSs was associated with DN, demonstrating ORs of 1.80 (95% CI 1.51 to 2.14) and 1.67 (95% CI 1.40 to 1.98), respectively.

conclusionsThe current study provided experimental evidence that hsCRP level was causally related to DN. These findings suggest that the elevated hsCRP may be a causal risk factor for DN in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesC-Reactive ProteinHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisRisk FactorsC-Reactive ProteinC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID36828641
PMCPMC9971832
OpenAlexW4321769565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.