Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36828597›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2023

Multisite Assessment of Optical Genome Mapping for Analysis of Structural Variants in Constitutional Postnatal Cases.

M Anwar Iqbal, Ulrich Broeckel, Brynn Levy, Steven Skinner, Nikhil S Sahajpal, Vanessa Rodriguez, Aaron Stence, Kamel Awayda, Gunter Scharer, Cindy Skinner and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

M Anwar IqbalDNA Microarray CGH Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Ulrich BroeckelSection of Genomic Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Brynn LevyColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Steven SkinnerGreenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina.
Nikhil S SahajpalGreenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina; Department of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia.
Vanessa RodriguezPraxis Genomics, Atlanta, Georgia.
Aaron StenceDepartment of Pathology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Kamel AwaydaDNA Microarray CGH Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Gunter ScharerSection of Genomic Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Cindy SkinnerGreenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina.
Roger StevensonGreenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina.
Aaron BosslerH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Peter L NagyPraxis Genomics, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: plnagy@praxisgenomics.com.
Ravindra KolheDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia. Electronic address: rkolhe@augusta.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares optical genome mapping (OGM) performed at multiple sites with current standard-of-care (SOC) methods used in clinical cytogenetics. This study included 50 negative controls and 359 samples from individuals (patients) with suspected genetic conditions referred for cytogenetic testing. OGM was performed using the Saphyr system and Bionano Access software version 1.7. Structural variants, including copy number variants, aneuploidy, and regions of homozygosity, were detected and classified according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Repeated expansions in FMR1 and contractions in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy 1 were also analyzed. OGM results were compared with SOC for technical concordance, clinical classification concordance, intrasite and intersite reproducibility, and ability to provide additional, clinically relevant information. Across five testing sites, 98.8% (404/409) of samples yielded successful OGM data for analysis and interpretation. Overall, technical concordance for OGM to detect previously reported SOC results was 99.5% (399/401). The blinded analysis and variant classification agreement between SOC and OGM was 97.6% (364/373). Replicate analysis of 130 structural variations was 100% concordant. On the basis of this demonstration of the analytic validity and clinical utility of OGM by this multisite assessment, the authors recommend this technology as an alternative to existing SOC tests for rapid detection and diagnosis in postnatal constitutional disorders.

Indexed as

AneuploidyGenomicsChromosome MappingCytogeneticsFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1HumansReproducibility of ResultsFMR1 protein, humanFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1

Identifiers

PMID36828597
PMCPMC10851778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.