Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36828386›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2023

Repeatability and Reproducibility Uncertainty in Magnetic Resonance-Based Electric Properties Tomography of a Homogeneous Phantom.

Alessandro Arduino, Francesca Pennecchi, Ulrich Katscher, Maurice Cox, Luca Zilberti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alessandro ArduinoIstituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Strada delle Cacce 91, 10135 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4829-5130
Francesca PennecchiIstituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Strada delle Cacce 91, 10135 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1328-3858
Ulrich KatscherPhilips Research Laboratories, 22335 Hamburg, Germany.
Maurice CoxNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington TW11 0LW, UK.
Luca ZilbertiIstituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Strada delle Cacce 91, 10135 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2382-4710

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncertainty assessment is a fundamental step in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging because it makes comparable, in a strict metrological sense, the results of different scans, for example during a longitudinal study. Magnetic resonance-based electric properties tomography (EPT) is a quantitative imaging technique that retrieves, non-invasively, a map of the electric properties inside a human body. Although EPT has been used in some early clinical studies, a rigorous experimental assessment of the associated uncertainty has not yet been performed. This paper aims at evaluating the repeatability and reproducibility uncertainties in phase-based Helmholtz-EPT applied on homogeneous phantom data acquired with a clinical 3 T scanner. The law of propagation of uncertainty is used to evaluate the uncertainty in the estimated conductivity values starting from the uncertainty in the acquired scans, which is quantified through a robust James-Stein shrinkage estimator to deal with the dimensionality of the problem. Repeatable errors are detected in the estimated conductivity maps and are quantified for various values of the tunable parameters of the EPT implementation. The spatial dispersion of the estimated electric conductivity maps is found to be a good approximation of the reproducibility uncertainty, evaluated by changing the position of the phantom after each scan. The results underpin the use of the average conductivity (calculated by weighting the local conductivity values by their uncertainty and taking into account the spatial correlation) as an estimate of the conductivity of the homogeneous phantom.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingTomographyHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyReproducibility of ResultsUncertaintyelectric properties tomographymagnetic resonance imagingphantomsquantitative imaginguncertainty

Identifiers

PMID36828386
PMCPMC9961522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.