ReviewThe American journal of medicine2023
Environmentally Mediated Health Disparities.
Review in The American journal of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rural and Urban Differences in Prostate Cancer Recurrence.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Midwest Urban-Rural Differences in Cancer Prevalence.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2025Article
- Environmental Risk Factors for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Through the Lens of Social Determinants of Health.Arthritis care & research · 2025Review
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cardio-Oncology Care.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Rectal Cancer Disparities Among the American Indian/Alaskan Native Populations.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Molecular connections between inflammation and social determinants of health.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2025Review
- Electrochemical microfluidic sensing platforms for biosecurity analysis.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Review
- Outdoor air pollution exposure and uterine cancer incidence in the Sister Study.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Air Pollution in Cardio-Oncology and Unraveling the Environmental Nexus:JACC. CardioOncology · 2024Review
- The NCCB Case Example: Reflections on a Successful Fourteen-Year CBPR Partnership.Journal of participatory research methods · 2024Article
- Arsenic Exposure in Well Water From the Perspective of Patients and Providers.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We describe important settings where environmental exposure leads to disease disparities. Lead exposure in urban settings disproportionately impacts the urban Black poor. Native Americans have been forcibly relocated to areas of the West that have arsenic-contaminated groundwater or exposure to radionuclides near mines and nuclear development. Latino farm workers are disproportionately exposed to pesticides and herbicides. These chemicals are associated with cancer, neuropsychiatric disorders, renal failure, and respiratory disorders. The rural poor, both white and of color, are disproportionately impacted by hydraulic fracturing, exposing residents to volatile organic compounds such as toluene and benzene and heavy metals such as lead and arsenic. The urban and rural poor are both exposed to air pollution that significantly impact health. Short- and long-term ambient air pollution exposure has been associated with all-cause cardiovascular disease, stroke, blood pressure, and ischemic heart disease. Cancer due to air pollution has disproportionately impacted poor communities like "Cancer Alley" where numerous industrial sources are geographically clustered. Understanding local environmental hazards and available resources to address them can enhance the quality of medical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.