ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2023
Mixed multiscale BM4D for three-dimensional optical coherence tomography denoising.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physics-guided deep learning-based real-time image reconstruction of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A multiscale extension for the well-known block matching and 4D filtering (BM4D) method is proposed by analyzing and extending the wavelet subbands denoising method in such a way that the proposed method avoids directly denoising detail subbands, which considerably simplifies the computations and makes the multiscale processing feasible in 3D. To this end, we first derive the multiscale construction method in 2D and propose multiscale extensions for three 2D natural image denoising methods. Then, the derivation is extended to 3D by proposing mixed multiscale BM4D (mmBM4D) for optical coherence tomography (OCT) image denoising. We tested mmBM4D on three public OCT datasets captured by various imaging devices. The experiments revealed that mmBM4D significantly outperforms its original counterpart and performs on par with the state-of-the-art OCT denoising methods. In terms of peak-signal-to-noise-ratio (PSNR), mmBM4D surpasses the original BM4D by more than 0.68 decibels over the first dataset. In the second and third datasets, significant improvements in the mean to standard deviation ratio, contrast to noise ratio, and equivalent number of looks were achieved. Furthermore, on the downstream task of retinal layer segmentation, the layer quality preservation of the compared OCT denoising methods is evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.