Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36827491›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Contraceptive Access and Use Among Undergraduate and Graduate Students During COVID-19: Online Survey Study.

Emily Chen, Adam Hollowell, Tracy Truong, Keisha Bentley-Edwards, Evan Myers, Alaattin Erkanli, Lauren Holt, Jonas J Swartz

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily ChenDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3669-0846
Adam HollowellSamuel Dubois Cook Center on Social Equity, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7748-5665
Tracy TruongDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5923-4037
Keisha Bentley-EdwardsDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8430-4850
Evan MyersDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9053-9864
Alaattin ErkanliDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5437-4900
Lauren HoltSchool of Nursing, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4299-9134
Jonas J SwartzDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9726-965X

Funding

Support for QA/QC for Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002553 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JENNIFER S, MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 2018 to 2023
$58.5M
Duke Women's Reproductive Health Research ScholarsK12HD103083 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Cindy Amundsen · 2020 to 2026
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002553NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD103083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread college campus closures in the months of March to June 2020, endangering students' access to on-campus health resources, including reproductive health services.

objectiveTo assess contraceptive access and use among undergraduate and graduate students in North Carolina during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey of undergraduate and graduate students enrolled at degree-granting institutions in North Carolina. Participants were recruited using targeted Instagram advertisements. The survey queried several aspects of participants' sexual behavior, including sex drive, level of sexual experience, number of sexual partners, digital sexual experience, dating patterns, and types of contraception used. Participants were asked to compare many of these behaviors before and after the pandemic. The survey also assessed several sociodemographic factors that we hypothesized would be associated with contraceptive use based on prior data, including educational background, sexual orientation and gender minority status (ie, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer), health insurance status, race, ethnicity, degree of sensation seeking, religiosity, and desire to become pregnant.

resultsOver 10 days, 2035 Instagram users began our survey, of whom 1002 met eligibility criteria. Of these 1002 eligible participants, 934 completed the survey, for a 93% completion rate. Our respondents were mostly female (665/934, 71%), cisgender (877/934, 94%), heterosexual (592/934, 64%), white (695/934 75%), not Hispanic (835/934, 89%), and enrolled at a 4-year college (618/934, 66%). Over 95% (895/934) of respondents reported that they maintained access to their preferred contraception during the COVID-19 pandemic. In a multivariable analysis, participants who were enrolled in a 4-year college or graduate program were less likely to lose contraceptive access when compared to participants enrolled in a 2-year college (risk ratio [RR] 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.71); in addition, when compared to cisgender participants, nonbinary and transgender participants were more likely to lose contraceptive access (RR 2.43, 95% CI 1.01-5.87). Respondents reported that they were more interested in using telehealth to access contraception during the pandemic. The contraceptive methods most commonly used by our participants were, in order, condoms (331/934, 35.4%), oral contraception (303/934, 32.4%), and long-acting reversible contraception (LARC; 221/934, 23.7%). The rate of LARC use among our participants was higher than the national average for this age group (14%). Emergency contraception was uncommonly used (25/934, 2.7%).

conclusionsUndergraduate and graduate students in North Carolina overwhelmingly reported that they maintained access to their preferred contraceptive methods during the COVID-19 pandemic and through changing patterns of health care access, including telehealth. Gender nonbinary and transgender students and 2-year college students may have been at greater risk of losing access to contraception during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

collegecontraceptionCOVID-19disparitieshealthcare accesshealth disparityhealth messaginghealth promotionhealth resourceLARCrisk factorsexual healthsocial mediatelehealth

Identifiers

PMID36827491
PMCPMC10018798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read74
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.