Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36827424›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Implementing PERFECT-ER with Plan-Do-Study-Act on acute orthopaedic hospital wards: Building knowledge from an implementation study using Normalization Process Theory.

Chris Fox, Simon P Hammond, Tamara Backhouse, Fiona Poland, Justin Waring, Bridget Penhale, Jane L Cross

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chris FoxNorwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.
Simon P HammondNorwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.
Tamara BackhouseSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.
Fiona PolandSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.
Justin WaringHealth Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
Bridget PenhaleSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.
Jane L CrossSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.ORCID 0000-0002-7003-1916
University of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health DTC-RP-PG-0311-12004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelivering care to growing numbers of patients with increasingly 'complex' needs is currently compromised by a system designed to treat patients within organizational clinical specialties, making this difficult to reconfigure to fit care to needs. Problematic experiences of people with cognitive impairment(s) admitted to hospitals with a hip fracture, exemplify the complex challenges that result if their care is not tailored. This study explored whether a flexible, multicomponent intervention, adapting services to the needs of this patient group, could be implemented in acute hospital settings.

methodsWe used action research with case study design to introduce the intervention using a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model to three different hospital sites (cases) across England. The qualitative data for this paper was researcher-generated (notes from observations and teleconference meetings) and change agent-generated (action plans and weekly reflective reports of change agents' activities). Normalization Process Theory (NPT) was used to analyze and explain the work of interacting actors in implementing and then normalizing (embedding) the intervention across contexts and times. Data analysis was abductive, generating inductive codes then identified with NPT constructs. Across the three cases, change agents had to work through numerous implementation challenges: needing to make sense of the intervention package, the PDSA model as implementation method, and their own role as change agents and to orientate these within their action context (coherence). They had to work to encourage colleagues to invest in these changes (cognitive participation) and find ways to implement the intervention by mobilising changes (collective action). Finally, they created strategies for clinical routines to continue to self-review, reconfiguring actions and future plans to enable the intervention to be sustained (reflexive monitoring).

conclusionsSuccessful implementation of the (PERFECT-ER) intervention requires change agents to recognize and engage with local values, and then to enable its fit with practice and wider contextual goals. A context of constant change fragments normalization. Thus, sustaining practice change over time is fragile and requires change agents to continue a recursive two-way sense-making process. This enables implementation and normalization to re-energize and overcome barriers to change.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesOrthopedicsEnglandHospitalsHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID36827424
PMCPMC9956631
OpenAlexW4321766059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.