Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36827347›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Sensitivity and predictive value of dysentery in diagnosing shigellosis among under five children in Zambia.

Sam Miti, Obvious N Chilyabanyama, Caroline C Chisenga, Mwelwa Chibuye, Samuel Bosomprah, Chisenga Mumba, Salome Chitondo, Seter Siziya, Dani Cohen, Roma Chilengi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of the performance and feasibility of RLDT in detectingmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sam MitiArthur Davison Children's Hospital, Ndola, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0002-2217-6897
Obvious N ChilyabanyamaCenter for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Caroline C ChisengaCenter for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0002-7850-7915
Mwelwa ChibuyeCenter for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Samuel BosomprahCenter for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Chisenga MumbaArthur Davison Children's Hospital, Ndola, Zambia.
Salome ChitondoArthur Davison Children's Hospital, Ndola, Zambia.
Seter SiziyaSchool of Medicine, Copperbelt University, Ndola, Zambia.
Dani CohenSchool of Public Health, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Roma ChilengiCenter for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Michelo SimuyandiCenter for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShigella is a leading cause of bacterial diarrhea morbidity and mortality affecting mainly children under five in the developing world. In Zambia, Shigella has a high prevalence of 34.7% in children with diarrhea and an attributable fraction of 6.7% in Zambian children with moderate to severe diarrhea. Zambian diarrhea management guidelines and the health ministry reporting tool Health Management Information System (HMIS) heavily rely on the WHO clinical classification of dysentery to potentially identify and estimate the burden of Shigella in children. This reliance on clinical dysentery as a proxy to shigellosis in under five children may be resulting in gross under-estimation of shigella disease burden in Zambia.

methodsWe used existing laboratory and clinical data to examine the sensitivity and predictive value of dysentery to correctly identify Shigella infection in under five children with PCR confirmed Shigella infection in Lusaka and Ndola districts, Zambia.

resultsClinical dysentery had a sensitivity of 8.5% (34/401) in identifying under five children with Shigella by stool PCR. Dysentery was able to correctly classify Shigella in 34 of 68 bloody stool samples giving a corresponding positive predictive value of 50%. Of the 1087 with non-bloody diarrhea, 720 did not have Shigella giving a negative predictive value of 66.2%.

conclusionsUse of clinical dysentery as a screening symptom for Shigella infection in children under five presenting with moderate to severe diarrhea has low sensitivity and low positive predictive value respectively. Clinical dysentery as a screening symptom for Shigella contributes to gross under diagnosis and reporting of Shigella infection among under five children in Zambia. Further research is required to better inform practice on more accurate methods or tools to use in support of routine diagnosis, particularly in low middle-income settings where laboratory diagnosis remains a challenge.

Indexed as

DysenteryDysentery, BacillaryShigellaChildDiarrheaHumansInfantZambia

Identifiers

PMID36827347
PMCPMC9955635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.