Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36827330›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Development, promotion, and application of online OvAge calculator based on the WeChat applet: Clinical prediction model research.

Wenwen Xu, Hui Wang, Linting Han, Xueli Zhao, Panpan Chen, Haiyang Zhao, Jing Jin, Zheng Zhu, Fang Shao, Qingling Ren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wenwen XuDepartment of Gynecology, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Hui WangExperimental Teaching Center of Basic Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Linting HanDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xueli ZhaoDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Panpan ChenDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Haiyang ZhaoDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jing JinDepartment of Gynecology, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Zheng ZhuSchool of Pediatrics, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Fang ShaoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qingling RenDepartment of Gynecology, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7383-9873
Nanjing Medical University · CNNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian age assessment is an important indicator to evaluate the ovarian reserve function and reproductive potential of women. At present, the application of ovarian age prediction model in China needs further improvement and optimization to make it more suitable for the actual situation of women in China. In this study, we collected subjects and their data in three ways: firstly, we collected clinical data from a number of women go to local hospital, including healthy women and women with DOR or PCOS; secondly, we obtained data by recruited healthy women through CRO companies for a fee; thirdly, we collected data from a number of healthy women using WeChat applet. Using the data collected by CRO company and WeChat applet, we applied the generalized linear model to optimize the ovarian age prediction model. The optimized formula is: OvAge = exp (3.5254-0.0001*PRL-0.0231*AMH), where P = 0.8195 for PRL and P = 0.0003 for AMH. Applying the formula to the hospital population data set for testing, it showed that the predicted ovarian age in the healthy women was comparable to their actual age, with a root mean squared error (RMSE) = 5.6324. The prediction accuracy was high. These data suggest that our modification of the ovarian age prediction model is feasible and that the formula is currently a more appropriate model for ovarian age assessment in healthy Chinese women. This study explored a new way to collect clinical data, namely, an online ovarian age calculator developed based on a WeChat applet, which can collect data from a large number of subjects in a short period of time and is more economical, efficient, and convenient. In addition, this study introduced real data to optimize the model, which could provide insights for model localization and improvement.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalOvarian ReserveAnti-Mullerian HormoneFemaleHumansOvaryPrognosisReproductionAnti-Mullerian Hormone

Identifiers

PMID36827330
PMCPMC9955625
OpenAlexW4321748710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.