Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36827294›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2023

Randomized crossover trial of 2-week Garment electrocardiogram with dry textile electrode to reveal instances of post-ablation recurrence of atrial fibrillation underdiagnosed during 24-hour Holter monitoring.

Takeshi Machino, Kazutaka Aonuma, Kazushi Maruo, Yuki Komatsu, Hiro Yamasaki, Miyako Igarashi, Akihiko Nogami, Masaki Ieda

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Utility and Wearability of the hitoeNeurology international · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takeshi MachinoFaculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9010-2857
Kazutaka AonumaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Kazushi MaruoFaculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Yuki KomatsuFaculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Hiro YamasakiFaculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Miyako IgarashiFaculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7684-271X
Akihiko NogamiFaculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Masaki IedaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
University of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and often recurs despite catheter ablation. The recurrence of AF is often underdiagnosed by standard 24-hour electrocardiogram (ECG) because of its transient and silent nature. A garment-style ECG with a highly conductive textile electrode made of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate)(PEDOTPSS) and nanofiber (Garment ECG) has been developed that can provide longer-term continuous monitoring. This study investigated whether 2-week Garment ECG can reveal instances of AF recurrence in patients who are diagnosed as remaining in sinus rhythm by 24-hour Holter ECG.

methodsThe open-label randomized crossover study enrolled 67 patients (63.1±10.6 years old, 53 men) who had undergone initial AF ablation. Three months after ablation, patients were randomly assigned to group 1 (n = 35), 2-week Garment ECG followed by 24-hour Holter ECG, or group 2 (n = 32), 24-hour Holter ECG followed by 2-week Garment ECG. The detection of AF recurrence was compared between the two devices.

resultsThe Garment ECG showed AF recurrence in 12 patients (18%) compared to 4 patients for the Holter ECG (6%, p = 0.008). The ECG acquisition rate was higher for Holter ECG than for Garment ECG (100.0% [interquartile range 100.0-100.0%] versus 82.4% [71.1-91.0%], p<0.001), but the Garment ECG provided longer total analysis time (11.0 days [9.0-12.2 days] for Garment; 1.0 day [1.0-1.0 day] for Holter, p<0.001).

conclusionsDespite the lower ECG acquisition rate, the 2-week Garment ECG revealed instances of AF recurrence after ablation in patients who were underdiagnosed by 24-hour Holter ECG.

trial registrationClinical Trial Registration: URL: https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs032180018 Unique Identifier: jRCTs032180018.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationAgedClothingCross-Over StudiesElectrocardiographyElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36827294
PMCPMC9955627
OpenAlexW4321749048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.