Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36827287›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2023

Exploratory clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transdermal electrical stimulation in patients with central retinal artery occlusion.

Gen Miura, Tadami Fujiwara, Takayuki Iwase, Yoshihito Ozawa, Yuki Shiko, Yohei Kawasaki, Tomohiro Nizawa, Tomoaki Tatsumi, Takayuki Baba, Takuji Kurimoto and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Review of Current Management Practices.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gen MiuraDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6288-8840
Tadami FujiwaraClinical Research Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Takayuki IwaseClinical Research Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshihito OzawaClinical Research Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yuki ShikoClinical Research Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yohei KawasakiClinical Research Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Tomohiro NizawaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Tomoaki TatsumiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Takayuki BabaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Takuji KurimotoDepartment of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Sotaro MoriDepartment of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1991-3232
Makoto NakamuraDepartment of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6464-4302
Hideki HanaokaClinical Research Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Shuichi YamamotoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Chiba University Hospital · JPChiba University · JPKobe University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of transdermal electrical stimulation (TdES) using skin electrodes in patients with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).

methodsFive eyes of five patients with CRAO underwent TdES (10-ms biphasic pulses, 20 Hz, 30 min) six times at 2-week intervals. Only the affected eye was stimulated with 1.0-mA pulses in all patients. The primary endpoint was the best-corrected logMAR visual acuity. The secondary endpoints were changes in the best-corrected logMAR visual acuity, Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity, mean deviation of the Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) 10-2, and HFA Esterman test score. We also evaluated its safety.

resultsThe logMAR visual acuity at 12 weeks was improved by 0.1 or more in two patients and was maintained in two patients compared to the baseline. No obvious changes in the mean logMAR visual acuity, ETDRS visual acuity, mean deviation, and HFA Esterman score were observed at 12 weeks compared to the baseline. All five enrolled patients completed the study according to the protocol. No treatment-related adverse events were observed during this study.

conclusionIn this study, logMAR visual acuity was slightly improved in two patients, confirming the safety of TdES. Since CRAO has no established treatment method, further research into the effects of TdES treatment in CRAO patients may be beneficial.

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyRetinal Artery OcclusionElectric StimulationEyeHumans

Identifiers

PMID36827287
PMCPMC9955643
OpenAlexW4321748715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.