ArticlePloS one2023
Optimizing hierarchical tree dissection parameters using historic epidemiologic data as 'ground truth'.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cyclospora Genotypic Variations and Associated Epidemiologic Characteristics, United States, 2018-2021.Emerging infectious diseases · 2025Article
- An improved framework for detecting discrete epidemiologically meaningful partitions in hierarchically clustered genetic data.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- Novel insights on the genetic population structure of human-infectingCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hierarchical clustering of pathogen genotypes is widely used to complement epidemiologic investigations of outbreaks. Investigators must dissect trees to obtain genetic partitions that provide epidemiologists with meaningful information. Statistical approaches to tree dissection often require a user-defined parameter to predict the optimal partition number and augmenting this parameter can drastically impact resultant partition memberships. Here, we demonstrate how to optimize a given tree dissection parameter to maximize accuracy irrespective of the tree dissection method used. We hierarchically clustered 1,873 genotypes of the foodborne pathogen Cyclospora spp., including 587 possessing links to historic outbreaks. We dissected the resulting tree using a statistical method requiring users to select the value of a 'stringency parameter' (s), with a recommended value of 95% to 99.5%. We dissected this hierarchical tree across s-values from 94% to 99.5% (at increments of 0.25%), to identify a value that maximized partitioning accuracy, defined as the degree to which genetic partitions conform to known epidemiologic groupings. We show that s-values of 96.5% and 96.75% yield the highest accuracy (> 99.9%) when clustering Cyclospora sp. isolates with known epidemiologic linkages. In practice, the optimized s-value will generate robust genetic partitions comprising isolates likely derived from a common food source, even when the epidemiologic grouping is not known prior to genetic clustering. While the s-value is specific to the tree dissection method used here, the optimization approach described could be applied to any parameter/method used to dissect hierarchical trees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.