Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36826954›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2023

A Standardized Approach for Skin Detection: Analysis of the Literature and Case Studies.

Loris Nanni, Andrea Loreggia, Alessandra Lumini, Alberto Dorizza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Loris NanniDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3502-7209
Andrea LoreggiaDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9846-0157
Alessandra LuminiDipartimento di Informatica-Scienza e Ingegneria, Università di Bologna, Via Dell'Università 50, 47521 Cesena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0290-7354
Alberto DorizzaDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0800-2567

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin detection involves identifying skin and non-skin areas in a digital image and is commonly used in various applications, such as analyzing hand gestures, tracking body parts, and facial recognition. The process of distinguishing between skin and non-skin regions in a digital image is widely used in a variety of applications, ranging from hand-gesture analysis to body-part tracking to facial recognition. Skin detection is a challenging problem that has received a lot of attention from experts and proposals from the research community in the context of intelligent systems, but the lack of common benchmarks and unified testing protocols has hampered fairness among approaches. Comparisons are very difficult. Recently, the success of deep neural networks has had a major impact on the field of image segmentation detection, resulting in various successful models to date. In this work, we survey the most recent research in this field and propose fair comparisons between approaches, using several different datasets. The main contributions of this work are (i) a comprehensive review of the literature on approaches to skin-color detection and a comparison of approaches that may help researchers and practitioners choose the best method for their application; (ii) a comprehensive list of datasets that report ground truth for skin detection; and (iii) a testing protocol for evaluating and comparing different skin-detection approaches. Moreover, we propose an ensemble of convolutional neural networks and transformers that obtains a state-of-the-art performance.

Indexed as

neural networksskin classificationskin databaseskin detectionskin segmentation

Identifiers

PMID36826954
PMCPMC9965146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.