ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2023
3D-Printed GelMA/PEGDA/F127DA Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital light processing bioprinting: bioink innovations and applications in tissue and organ regeneration.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Modern Drug Delivery Platforms Based on Photocrosslinkable Hydrogels (PCHs) in Dentistry: From Material Characteristics to Clinical Applications-A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Biocompatible CMCHMA/F127DA Hydrogel with ROS-Scavenging Activity Prevents Postoperative Peritoneal Adhesions.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Article
- GelMA-Based Nanocomposites for Bone Defect Regeneration: Design, Performance, and Clinical Translation Potential.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Development of a Tunable Dextran-PCL Biomaterial Photoink for High-Resolution DLP 3D Printing in Biomedical Applications.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Gelatin Methacrylate Macroporous Cell Scaffold Fabrication via One-Pot Aqueous Two-Phase Separation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2025Article
- Strategic advances in Vat Photopolymerization for 3D printing of calcium phosphate-based bone scaffolds: A review.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Review
- Bioprinting of GelMA/PEGDA Hybrid Bioinks for SH-SY5Y Cell Encapsulation: Role of Molecular Weight and Concentration.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- Enhanced Ear Cartilage Regeneration with Dual-Network LT-GelMA/F127DA Hydrogel Featuring Nanomicelle Integration.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Development of Hydrogels Fabricated via Stereolithography for Bioengineering Applications.Polymers · 2025Review
- Trabecular-bone mimicking osteoconductive collagen scaffolds: an optimized 3D printing approach using freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- Thermo-sensitive Poloxamer based antibacterial anti-inflammatory and photothermal conductive multifunctional hydrogel as injectable, in situ curable and adjustable intraocular lens.Bioactive materials · 2024Article
- Comparison of Bioengineered Scaffolds for the Induction of Osteochondrogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Enhanced osteogenic differentiation in 3D hydrogel scaffold via macrophage mitochondrial transfer.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- Review
- 3D Bioprinting Techniques and Bioinks for Periodontal Tissues Regeneration-A Literature Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- In vivo biocompatibility assessment of 3D printed bioresorbable polymers for brain tissue regeneration. A feasibility study.Regenerative therapy · 2024Article
- Biomaterials Adapted to Vat Photopolymerization in 3D Printing: Characteristics and Medical Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue-engineered scaffolds are an effective method for the treatment of bone defects, and their structure and function are essential for bone regeneration. Digital light processing (DLP) printing technology has been widely used in bone tissue engineering (BTE) due to its high printing resolution and gentle printing process. As commonly used bioinks, synthetic polymers such as polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) and Pluronic F127 diacrylate (F127DA) have satisfactory printability and mechanical properties but usually lack sufficient adhesion to cells and tissues. Here, a compound BTE scaffold based on PEGDA, F127DA, and gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) was successfully prepared using DLP printing technology. The scaffold not only facilitated the adhesion and proliferation of cells, but also effectively promoted the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in an osteoinductive environment. Moreover, the bone tissue volume/total tissue volume (BV/TV) of the GelMA/PEGDA/F127DA (GPF) scaffold in vivo was 49.75 ± 8.50%, higher than the value of 37.10 ± 7.27% for the PEGDA/F127DA (PF) scaffold and 20.43 ± 2.08% for the blank group. Therefore, the GPF scaffold prepared using DLP printing technology provides a new approach to the treatment of bone defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.