ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2023
Chitosan/Phenolic Compounds Scaffolds for Connective Tissue Regeneration.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- In situ assembled MIL-101(Cr) composite functionalized with chitosan and tannic acid as an efficient adsorbent for PbScientific reports · 2026Article
- Fermented Plant Extract-Loaded Collagen Scaffolds: Bioactive Hydrogels for Enhanced Wound Repair and Immune Modulation.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Redox Properties of Polyphenols and Their Role in ROS Generation for Biomedical Applications.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Review
- Biodegradability Study of Modified Chitosan Films with Cinnamic Acid and Ellagic Acid in Soil.Polymers · 2024Article
- Application Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Engineering Antioxidant Surfaces for Titanium-Based Metallic Biomaterials.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Chitosan-based scaffolds modified by gallic acid, ferulic acid, and tannic acid were fabricated. The aim of the experiment was to compare the compatibility of scaffolds based on chitosan with gallic acid, ferulic acid, or tannic acid using the in vivo method. For this purpose, materials were implanted into rabbits in the middle of the latissimus dorsi muscle length. A scaffold based on unmodified chitosan was implanted by the same method as a control. Moreover, the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy-attenuated total reflectance (FTIR-ATR) spectra and scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations were made to study the interactions between chitosan and phenolic acids. Additionally, antioxidant properties and blood compatibility were investigated. The results showed that all studied materials were safe and non-toxic. However, chitosan scaffolds modified by gallic acid and tannic acid were resorbed faster and, as a result, tissues were organized faster than those modified by ferulic acid or unmodified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.