ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023
Validation of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing of the Periocular Microbiome and Lack of Alteration by Topical Eyedrops.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Carboxymethylcellulose Artificial Tears on Ocular Surface Microbiome Diversity and Composition, A Randomized Controlled Trial.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Trial
- An Update and Overview of the Ocular and Extraocular Microbiome and Its Impact on Ophthalmic Care.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Transcending genome-wide association studies to create useful multi-omic views of glaucoma.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2026Review
- The Ocular Microbiome: Micro-Steps Towards Macro-Shift in Targeted Treatment? A Comprehensive Review.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Microbiome as an endocrine organ and its relationship with eye diseases: Effective factors and new targeted approaches.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2024Review
- Exploring the Ocular Surface Microbiome and Tear Proteome in Glaucoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Topical Antibiotic Therapy in the Ocular Environment: The Benefits of Using Moxifloxacin Eyedrops.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Fecal microbiota transplantation for glaucoma; a potential emerging treatment strategy.Current research in microbial sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Genomic techniques for characterizing the ocular microbiome require further validation. We compared the microbiome of patients' eyelids through both conventional culture and 16S rRNA analysis and analyzed the impact of eyedrop use on microbiome diversity. Methods: Ninety-eight patients followed for management of glaucoma or suspicion of glaucoma had eyelid swabs performed with Isohelix MS Mini DNA Swabs (98 participants) and ESwabs (49 participants) for 16S rRNA analysis and conventional culture, respectively. The effect of preservative-containing eyedrops on the microbiomes detected using these two techniques were analyzed and compared across techniques. Results: Forty-five of the 50 (non-unique) genera (90%) identified by conventional culture were also identified by each individual's 16S rRNA analysis within the top 14 most abundant organisms present based on operational taxonomic unit. All conventional cultures performed had at least one or more genera also identified by each participant's 16S rRNA analysis. There was no difference in the conventional culture positivity rate or proportion of participants with a particular genus present on conventional culture based on whether preservative-containing eyedrops were regularly used. Similarly, in eyes using versus not using eyedrops, no differences were observed in the proportions of participants with a particular genus present or the Shannon index as determined by 16S rRNA analysis. Conclusions: 16S rRNA analysis correlates well with conventional culture results for the eyelid microbiome, with results from neither technique demonstrating an association of microbiome composition and eyedrop use. The clinical relevance of the large numbers of microbes detected via 16S rRNA analysis requires further study. Translational Relevance: 16S rRNA analysis of the periocular microbiome is consistent with conventional culture and enables further study of physiologic and pathologic ocular processes possibly related to microbiome diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.