Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36826753›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2023

Effect of Liposomal-Lactoferrin-Based Eye Drops on the Conjunctival Microflora of Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery.

Giuseppe Giannaccare, Sofia Comis, Virginia Jannuzzi, Davide Camposampiero, Diego Ponzin, Sergio Cambria, Marcello Santocono, Nicola Pallozzi Lavorante, Chiara Del Noce, Vincenzo Scorcia and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe GiannaccareDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy. giuseppe.giannaccare@unicz.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2617-0289
Sofia ComisFondazione Banca degli Occhi del Veneto, Venice, Italy.
Virginia JannuzziFondazione Banca degli Occhi del Veneto, Venice, Italy.
Davide CamposampieroFondazione Banca degli Occhi del Veneto, Venice, Italy.
Diego PonzinFondazione Banca degli Occhi del Veneto, Venice, Italy.
Sergio CambriaPolilab Srl, Catania, Italy.
Marcello SantoconoCentro Oculistico Dott. Marcello Santocono, Catania, Italy.
Nicola Pallozzi LavoranteIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Chiara Del NoceIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Vincenzo ScorciaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Carlo E TraversoIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Aldo VaggeIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITVeneto Eye Bank Foundation · ITMagna Graecia University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostoperative endophthalmitis is typically caused by the patient's conjunctival bacterial flora. Povidone iodine solution (5%) is used perioperatively to obtain periocular and ocular antisepsis. However, an adjunctive prophylaxis procedure could further help control the conjunctival microbial load. Considering the increase in antibiotic resistance, a progressive shift toward alternative methods would be desirable. Somilux

methodsLF-based eye drops or a vehicle solution (water solution) were instilled 4 times a day starting 3 days before cataract surgery. Before the therapy (T0) and at the time of surgery (T1), a conjunctival swab was performed in both eyes and processed to detect microbial growth, microbiological isolation, and species identification. The outcome was the quantification and characterization of the local microbial flora before and after using LF-based or vehicle-based eye drops. Safety of the treatments was also evaluated.

results88 eyes of 44 patients (mean [± SD] age 75 [± 12.6] years) were enrolled. At baseline, 54 conjunctival swabs showed only saprophytic flora, 27 showed only potential pathogenic flora, and seven showed both of them. LF-based eye drops reduced the proportion of potentially pathogenic bacteria (36% at T0 vs. 9% at T1, p = 0.008) compared with the vehicle (41% at T0 vs. 55% at T1, p = 0.302) without altering the physiological ocular microbial composition. No adverse events have been reported.

conclusionOur findings provide a novel contribution to the scientific knowledge on the role of LF in the ophthalmic field, supporting the use of LF-based eye drops as a safe and selective treatment to improve the ocular surface physiological defenses and control the bacterial ocular surface contamination prior to cataract surgery.

Indexed as

Bacterial loadCataract surgeryEndophthalmitisLactoferrinOcular microbiota

Identifiers

PMID36826753
PMCPMC10011268
OpenAlexW4321749226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.