Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36826742›Full record

ReviewPain and therapy2023

New Synthetic Opioids: Clinical Considerations and Dangers.

Amber N Edinoff, David Martinez Garza, Stephen P Vining, Megan E Vasterling, Eric D Jackson, Kevin S Murnane, Adam M Kaye, Richard N Fair, Yair Jose Lopez Torres, Ahmed E Badr and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Respiratory Depression Associated with Opioids: A Narrative Review.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Informing evidence-based medicine for opioid use disorder using pharmacoeconomic studies.Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Amber N EdinoffDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. aedinoff@mgh.harvard.edu.
David Martinez GarzaDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Stephen P ViningLouisiana State University Health Science Center at Shreveport, School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Megan E VasterlingLouisiana State University Health at New Orleans, School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Eric D JacksonUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Kevin S MurnaneLouisiana Addiction Research Center, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Adam M KayeDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA, 95211, USA.
Richard N FairDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Science Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71130-3932, USA.
Yair Jose Lopez TorresDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Science Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71130-3932, USA.
Ahmed E BadrDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Science Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71130-3932, USA.
Elyse M CornettLouisiana Addiction Research Center, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA. elyse.bradley@lsuhs.edu.
Alan D KayeLouisiana Addiction Research Center, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · USHarvard University · USLouisiana State University in Shreveport · USUniversity of the Pacific · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the early 2010s, synthetic opioids have significantly contributed to overall opioid-related overdose mortalities. For point of reference, of the 68,630 opioid-related deaths recorded in 2020, 56,516 involved synthetic opioids. During much of this period, fentanyl has been the most commonly used synthetic opioid. This time when fentanyl was the most popular opioid has been called the "third wave" of the opioid crisis, partly because it led to a sharp rise in deaths from overdoses. Other synthetic opioids, such as carfentanil, protonitazene, and isotonitazene, have also become more widely diverted for nonmedical used. Carfentanil is an even more potent fentanyl derivative that was initially used in the mid-1980s as a general anesthetic for large animals such as elephants. Related to its strong affinity for mu opioid receptors, carfentanil is still utilized in medicine and science today as a radiotracer for positron emission tomography imaging. Protonitazene and isotonitazene belong to a novel class of synthetic opioids called benzimidazoles that were manufactured in the 1950s as novel analgesics. These agents have come under recent scrutiny as designer synthetic opioids becoming more prevalent. However, to date, there is incomplete data regarding the prevalence of synthetic opioids, as traditional toxicology screenings may not be sensitive to detect these compounds at such low doses post-mortem, particularly when blood is drawn from the periphery instead of central tissues such as the brain, lung, or heart. This narrative review aims to highlight the clinical challenges presented by these new synthetic opioids.

Indexed as

CarfentanilFentanylisotonitazeneOverdoseProtonitazeneSynthetic opioids

Identifiers

PMID36826742
PMCPMC9950705
OpenAlexW4321748136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.