Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36826707›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2023

Use of Structured Electronic Health Records Data Elements for the Development of Computable Phenotypes to Identify Potential Adverse Events Associated with Intravenous Immunoglobulin Infusion.

Jillian H Hurst, Amanda Brucker, Congwen Zhao, Hannah Driscoll, Haley P Hostetler, Michael Phillips, Bari Rosenberg, Marc D Samsky, Isaac Smith, Megan E Reller and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jillian H HurstDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. jillian.hurst@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5079-9920
Amanda BruckerDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Congwen ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Hannah DriscollDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Haley P HostetlerDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael PhillipsDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Bari RosenbergDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Marc D SamskySection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Isaac SmithDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Megan E RellerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
John J StrouseDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Cindy Ke ZhouCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Graça M DoresCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Hui-Lee WongCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Benjamin A GoldsteinDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Health and Discovery Initiative, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · USCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDetection of adverse reactions to drugs and biologic agents is an important component of regulatory approval and post-market safety evaluation. Real-world data, including insurance claims and electronic health records data, are increasingly used for the evaluation of potential safety outcomes; however, there are different types of data elements available within these data resources, impacting the development and performance of computable phenotypes for the identification of adverse events (AEs) associated with a given therapy.

objectiveTo evaluate the utility of different types of data elements to the performance of computable phenotypes for AEs.

methodsWe used intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) as a model therapeutic agent and conducted a single-center, retrospective study of 3897 individuals who had at least one IVIG administration between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019. We identified the potential occurrence of four different AEs, including two proximal AEs (anaphylaxis and heart rate alterations) and two distal AEs (thrombosis and hemolysis). We considered three different computable phenotypes: (1) an International Classification of Disease (ICD)-based phenotype; (2) a phenotype-based on EHR-derived contextual information based on structured data elements, including laboratory values, medication administrations, or vital signs; and (3) a compound phenotype that required both an ICD code for the AE in combination with additional EHR-derived structured data elements. We evaluated the performance of each of these computable phenotypes compared with chart review-based identification of AEs, assessing the positive predictive value (PPV), specificity, and estimated sensitivity of each computable phenotype method.

resultsCompound computable phenotypes had a high positive predictive value for acute AEs such as anaphylaxis and bradycardia or tachycardia; however, few patients had both ICD codes and the relevant contextual data, which decreased the sensitivity of these computable phenotypes. In contrast, computable phenotypes for distal AEs (i.e., thrombotic events or hemolysis) frequently had ICD codes for these conditions in the absence of an AE due to a prior history of such events, suggesting that patient medical history of AEs negatively impacted the PPV of computable phenotypes based on ICD codes.

conclusionsThese data provide evidence for the utility of different structured data elements in computable phenotypes for AEs. Such computable phenotypes can be used across different data sources for the detection of infusion-related adverse events.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisImmunoglobulins, IntravenousAlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsHemolysisHumansPhenotypeRetrospective StudiesImmunoglobulins, Intravenous

Identifiers

PMID36826707
OpenAlexW4321748929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.