ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023
Can repeated surgical resection offer a chance of cure for recurrent cholangiocarcinoma?
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- AJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- New trends in diagnosis and management of gallbladder carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- Novel Adiponectin Receptor Agonist Inhibits Cholangiocarcinoma via Adenosine Monophosphate-activated Protein Kinase.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Perihilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma after Resection: Clinicopathological Characteristics, Outcomes, and Implications for Addition of Chemoradiotherapy.Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe incidence of cholangiocarinoma (CCA), as well as the related mortality rate, has progressively increased over the last decades. Nevertheless improvement in patient management, diagnosis and therapies, recurrence rate remains high (50-70%) with a low 5-year survival (7-20%). Palliative chemotherapy and best supportive care are the treatment of choice in case of recurrence. In recent years, some reports have been published on repeated resection suggesting a survival benefit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of all repeated resections for recurrent CCA in our institution. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of all data recorded in our prospective maintained database of all patients who underwent repeated resection for recurrence of any type of CCA (intrahepatic, perihilar, distal, and gallbladder) with curative intent in our institution.
resultsBetween 1997 and 2017, twenty-six patients underwent repeated surgical resection for recurrent CCA. Median time to first recurrence was 20 months. Site of recurrence was liver in 18 patients (70%), lymph nodes in 6 (23%), and lungs in 2 (7%). Twenty-five patients (96%) underwent upfront surgical resection of the recurrence, while one received preoperative chemotherapy. Median overall and disease-free survival from repeated surgical resection was 21 and 18 months with a 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival of 87, 41, 29% and 75%, 27%, and 17% respectively. Five patients (21%) did not experience recurrence after repeated surgical resection after a median follow-up of 73 months.
conclusionsRepeated surgical resection of recurrent CCAs is feasible with good postoperative results and can lead to an increase in survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.