Trial reportClinical oral investigations2023
A novel porcine dentin-derived bone graft material provides effective site stability for implant placement after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03150472 (Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Ivory Dentin Graft Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Ivory Dentin Graft Device
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dentinal Grafts, a Promising Material for Alveolar Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Radiographic and histomorphometric evaluation of Autogenous Particulated Dentin for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- High-Dose Shilajit Enhances Xenograft-Mediated Bone Regeneration in a Rat Tibial Defect Model: An In Vivo Experimental Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bone Stability After Immediate Implants and Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A 15-Year Retrospective Clinical Study.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Review
- Review
- Injectable Xenogeneic Dental Pulp Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Hydrogel Promotes Functional Dental Pulp Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Biomaterials for Alveolar Ridge Preservation as a Preoperative Procedure for Implant Treatment: History and Current Evidence.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Dentin-derived alveolar bone graft for alveolar augmentation: A systematic review.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAssessment of the clinical performance of a porcine dentin-derived particulate bone graft material for bone regeneration after tooth extraction with implant placement at 4 months, in comparison to a commercially available porcine bone-derived graft. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis study was a randomized, parallel-group, semi-double-blinded clinical trial evaluating the clinical safety, tolerability, and performance of Ivory Dentin Graft™ in comparison with a commercial bone-derived material in alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction (registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, May 12th, 2017, Identifier NCT03150472). Extraction sites were grafted with test or comparator material and a titanium implant placed at 4 months after taking a graft site biopsy. Primary endpoints were the extent of new bone growth and bone-graft integration at 4 months.
resultsThe dentin graft material had statistically significantly more new bone formation (60.75% vs 42.81%, p = 0.0084, N = 20 vs 16), better bone-graft integration scores (good integration in 85% vs 40%, p = 0.0066), and higher mean radiodensity of the bone (981.5HU vs 727.7HU, p = 0.0011) at the graft site compared to the bone-derived material. The mean implant insertion torque force was similar for the dentin and bone materials (34.75 Ncm vs 34.06 Ncm). Titanium implant placement was successful in 95% of patients with the dentin graft material compared to 81.25% for the bone graft. Both materials had similar clinical safety and tolerability as determined by adverse events and local site reactions. Physician-assessed ease of grafting and ease of implant placement on a 10-point scale showed no statistical differences (8.78 vs 8.27, p = 0.2355; 8.05 vs 8.75, p = 0.1118, respectively).
conclusionsA porcine dentin-derived bone graft material has clinical safety, tolerability, and performance for implant placement at 4 months after tooth extraction at least as good as a commercial bone-derived material. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The availability of porcine dentin-derived bone graft material allows wider use of dentin-derived material which has so far only been available in the form of autologous dentin from the patient's own teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.