Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36826456›Full record

Observational studyNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2023

Predictors of response to galcanezumab in patients with chronic migraine: a real-world prospective observational study.

Hyoung Cheol Lee, Soohyun Cho, Byung-Kun Kim

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Migraine Comorbidities.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Update of Gepants in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyoung Cheol Lee *Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, 01830, Korea.
Soohyun Cho *Department of Neurology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea.
Byung-Kun KimDepartment of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, 01830, Korea. kbk1403@eulji.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1053-4682
Eulji University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite high efficacy and tolerability, not all patients with chronic migraine benefit from anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. We aimed to identify the clinical predictors of the response to galcanezumab treatment in patients with chronic migraine from real-world data.

methodsWe prospectively recruited patients with CM who underwent galcanezumab injections between December 2019 and February 2022. Treatment response was determined after three months of follow-up and was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days. The migraine characteristics, comorbidities, and other treatment responses were compared between the responder and non-responder groups.

resultsOf 238 patients with CM, 153 (64.3%) showed treatment response. The responder group was younger, had lower frequency of baseline headache days, and had more accompanying symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and photophobia. Better triptan response and less depression were also observed in the responder group. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that the everyday headache (OR = 0.351, 95% CI = 0.133-0.874, p = 0.017), depression (OR = 0.439, 95% CI = 0.216-0.896, p = 0.024) and absence of accompanying symptoms (OR = 0.314, 95% CI = 0.118-0.834, p = 0.020) were significantly associated with response to galcanezumab treatment.

conclusionsOur real-world data showed the efficacy of galcanezumab in patients with CM, regardless of medication overuse. Everyday headache, presence of depression, and absence of accompanying symptoms of migraine were significant predictors of a poor response.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodHeadacheHumansTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedgalcanezumabCalcitonin gene-related peptideChronic migraineGalcanezumabMonoclonal antibody

Identifiers

PMID36826456
OpenAlexW4321749640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.