Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36826377›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on prostate cancer outcomes at an uro-oncology referral center.

Guilherme Miranda Andrade, Lucas Sesconetto, Rafael Benjamim Rosa da Silva, Gabriela Guimarães Rodrigues Dos Santos, Paulo Priante Kayano, Willy Baccaglini, Murilo Borges Bezerra, Bianca Bianco, Gustavo Caserta Lemos, Arie Carneiro

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MRI Changed the diagnosis of prostate cancer.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in a prospective cohort of COVID-19 survivors.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guilherme Miranda AndradeDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein - HIAE, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Lucas SesconettoDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein - HIAE, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Rafael Benjamim Rosa da SilvaDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein - HIAE, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Gabriela Guimarães Rodrigues Dos SantosFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Paulo Priante KayanoDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein - HIAE, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Willy BaccagliniDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein - HIAE, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Murilo Borges BezerraFaculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Bianca BiancoDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein - HIAE, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Gustavo Caserta LemosDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein - HIAE, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Arie CarneiroDepartamento de Urologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein - HIAE, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo evaluate the possible effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the oncologic results of patients with prostate cancer regarding clinical staging, presence of adverse pathological outcomes, and perioperative complications. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. The time between biopsy and surgery, staging tests, final histopathological evaluation after surgery, lymphadenectomy rate, postoperative complications, and prostatic specific antigen (PSA) levels (initial and 30 days after surgery) were analyzed and compared in a group of patients before and during the pandemic period.

resultsWe included 226 patients: 88 in the pre-pandemic period and 138 during the pandemic period. There was no statistically significant difference in mean age, body mass index, ASA, pathological locally advanced disease, the proportion of patients who underwent lymphadenectomy, and ISUP grade in the biopsy between the groups. Positive surgical margins, prostatic extracapsular extension, and PSA levels at 30 days were also similar between the groups. The mean time between medical consultation and surgery was longer in the pandemic period than in the pre-pandemic (124 vs. 107 days, p<0.001), and the mean time between biopsy and medical consultation (69.5 days vs. 114 days, p<0.001) and between biopsy and surgery (198.5 days vs. 228 days, p=0.013) was shorter during the pandemic. The incidence of severe early and late perioperative complications was similar between the periods.

conclusionsThere was no delay between diagnosis and treatment at our institution during the COVID-19 pandemic period. No worsening of the prostate cancer features was observed.

Indexed as

COVID-19Prostatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingPandemicsProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenCOVID-19ProstatectomyProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID36826377
PMCPMC10247232
OpenAlexW4321748436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.