Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36826149›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

Vitamin D and Sun Exposure: A Community Survey in Australia.

Vu Tran, Monika Janda, Robyn M Lucas, Donald S A McLeod, Bridie S Thompson, Mary Waterhouse, David C Whiteman, Rachel E Neale

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Messages for ultraviolet-radiation protection to fair-skinned populations.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vu TranQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2754-6850
Monika JandaThe University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
Robyn M LucasThe Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2736-3541
Donald S A McLeodQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1131-020X
Bridie S ThompsonQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
Mary WaterhouseQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
David C WhitemanQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
Rachel E NealeQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7162-0854
The University of Queensland · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUAustralian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sun exposure carries both harms and benefits. Exposing the skin to the sun is the main modifiable cause of skin cancers, which exert a considerable health and economic burden in Australia. The most well-established benefit of exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is vitamin D production. Australia has the highest incidence of skin cancer in the world but, despite the high ambient UV radiation, approximately one quarter of the population is estimated to be vitamin D deficient. Balancing the risks and benefits is challenging and requires effective communication. We sought to provide a snapshot of public knowledge and attitudes regarding sun exposure and vitamin D and to examine the associations between these factors and sun protective behaviors. In 2020 we administered an online survey; 4824 participants with self-reported fair or medium skin color were included in this analysis. Only 25% and 34% of participants were able to identify the amount of time outdoors needed to maintain adequate vitamin D status in summer and winter, respectively and 25% were concerned that sunscreen use inhibits vitamin D synthesis. This lack of knowledge was associated with suboptimal sun protection practices. Public education is warranted to prevent over-exposure, while supporting natural vitamin D production.

Indexed as

Skin NeoplasmsVitamin D DeficiencyHumansSunlightSurveys and QuestionnairesUltraviolet RaysVitamin DVitamin Dattitudesknowledgeskin cancerssun exposuresun protectionvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID36826149
PMCPMC9955356
OpenAlexW4321378339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.