Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36826135›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

'Beyond Cancer' Rehabilitation Program to Support Breast Cancer Survivors to Return to Health, Wellness and Work: Feasibility Study Outcomes.

Dianne M Sheppard, Moira O'Connor, Michael Jefford, Georgina Lamb, Dorothy Frost, Niki Ellis, Georgia K B Halkett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A multidisciplinary intervention to support return to work of individuals with breast cancer: a prospective feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Returning to Work after Breast Cancer: A One-Year Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dianne M SheppardMonash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Building 70, 21 Alliance Lane, Clayton 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9928-1740
Moira O'ConnorSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Kent St, Bentley 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7298-5553
Michael JeffordDepartment of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8792-7807
Georgina LambIPAR Rehabilitation, 485 La Trobe St, Melbourne 3000, Australia.
Dorothy FrostIPAR Rehabilitation, 485 La Trobe St, Melbourne 3000, Australia.
Niki EllisHealthy Working Lives Research Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 2, 533 St Kilda Road, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Georgia K B HalkettCurtin School of Nursing/Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Kent St, Bentley 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4065-4044

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More women are returning to work following breast cancer treatment. Our team designed 'Beyond Cancer', a multimodal rehabilitation program to support breast cancer survivors to return to work. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of the intervention from the breast cancer survivor, employer and occupational rehabilitation provider perspectives. The feasibility design focused on implementation, acceptability and preliminary indications of efficacy. Primary outcome measures included work status, work capacity and perceived support at work. Responses were compared with an historical usual care group of mixed cancer survivors. The tailored intervention was delivered over 33 weeks (on average) by trained occupational rehabilitation consultants. Eighty-four women with breast cancer (mean age = 50.8 years, SD = 8.24) who were unable to work in their pre-diagnosis capacity for >3 months participated. Results provided preliminary indications of efficacy for primary work outcomes, including work capacity relative to the historical usual care group, and some secondary biopsychosocial variables (physical fatigue, return to work expectations). The intervention was acceptable, demonstrated strong participant engagement and high satisfaction. Feasibility has been demonstrated for this multimodal intervention focused on returning to sustainable work for women with breast cancer. Future research is required with people diagnosed with other cancer types to demonstrate broader implementation.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsFatigueFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedResearch Designbreast cancer survivorshipfeasibility studymultimodalreturn to worksustainable workvocational rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36826135
PMCPMC9956005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.