Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36826126›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

The Landscape of Immunotherapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

Alicia A Gingrich, Elise F Nassif, Christina L Roland, Emily Z Keung

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alicia A GingrichDepartment of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Elise F NassifSarcoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3794-6759
Christina L RolandDepartment of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3400-0087
Emily Z KeungDepartment of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant multidisciplinary scientific effort has been undertaken to understand the heterogeneous family of neoplasms that comprise soft tissue sarcomas. Within this family of neoplasms, outcomes for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are currently limited given a lack of effective therapies. In this review, we focus on immunotherapy and its relationship with the common RPS histologic subtypes. Although initial outcomes for RPS patients with immune checkpoint inhibition alone have been somewhat disappointing, subsequent analyses on histologies, the tumor microenvironment, sarcoma immune class, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and genetic analysis for tumor mutational burden have yielded insight into the interplay between sarcomas and immunotherapy. Such approaches have all provided critical insight into the environment and characterization of these tumors, with targets for potential immunotherapy in future clinical trials. With this insight, molecularly tailored combination treatments for improving response rates and oncologic outcomes for RPS are promising.

Indexed as

Retroperitoneal NeoplasmsSarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansImmunotherapyTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, Tumorimmunotherapyretroperitoneal sarcomasarcoma immune classtumor infiltrating lymphocytetumor microenvironmenttumor mutational burden

Identifiers

PMID36826126
PMCPMC9955848
OpenAlexW4319755519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.