Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36826067›Full record

Observational studyCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

Prospective Evaluation of

Nicole Brighi, Giuseppe Lamberti, Elisa Andrini, Cristina Mosconi, Lisa Manuzzi, Giada Donati, Andrea Lisotti, Davide Campana

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Differential diagnosis and predictive markers of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNET).Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole BrighiDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1187-5481
Giuseppe LambertiDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3069-7630
Elisa AndriniDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2952-1507
Cristina MosconiDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Lisa ManuzziDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Giada DonatiDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Andrea LisottiGastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, 40026 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7724-7402
Davide CampanaDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4615-7340
IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temozolomide (TEM) as a single agent or in combination with capecitabine (CAPTEM) is active in well-differentiated advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of gastro-entero-pancreatic and thoracic origin. The predictive role of MGMT-promoter methylation in this setting is controversial. We sought to prospectively evaluate the MGMT-promoter methylation status ability to predict outcomes to TEM-based chemotherapy in patients with NET. A single-center, prospective, observational study has been conducted at the ENETS Center-of-Excellence Outpatient Clinic of the IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi in Bologna, Italy. Patients with advanced, gastro-entero-pancreatic or lung well-differentiated NETs candidate to TEM-based chemotherapy and with available tumor samples for MGMT-promoter methylation assessment were included. The MGMT-promoter methylation status was analyzed by using pyrosequencing. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by the MGMT-promoter methylation status. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Survival outcomes were compared by restricted mean survival time (RMST) difference. Of 26 screened patients, 22 were finally enrolled in the study. The most frequent NET primary sites were the pancreas (64%) and the lung (23%). MGMT promoter was methylated in five tumors (23%). At a median follow-up time of 47.2 months (95%CI 29.3-89.7), the median PFS was 32.8 months (95%CI 17.2-NA), while the median OS was not reached. Patients in the methylated MGMT group, when compared to those in the unmethylated MGMT group, had longer PFS (median not reached [95%CI NA-NA] vs. 30.2 months [95%CI 15.2-NA], respectively; RMST

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingNeuroendocrine TumorsDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesHumansMethylationProspective StudiesTemozolomideTumor Suppressor ProteinsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTemozolomideTumor Suppressor Proteinsbiomarkerschemotherapyepigeneticgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrine neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID36826067
PMCPMC9955977
OpenAlexW4317209269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.