Observational studyCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023
Prospective Evaluation of
Observational study in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design, Synthesis and Evaluation of Anticancer Potential of Novel Pyrrolopyrazines Against Glioblastoma: Mechanistic Details and In Vivo Safety Analysis.Archiv der Pharmazie · 2026Article
- PDMSA: A Web-Based Tool for Pan-Cancer Survival Analysis Using DNA Methylation Levels as Biomarkers.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Molecular docking and dynamics reveal novel CDK6 inhibitors for targeted glioblastoma therapy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of MGMT methylation on overall survival in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Differential diagnosis and predictive markers of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNET).Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Role of PDGFRα-mediated signalling in anoikis resistance in glioblastoma: in vitro study.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2025Article
- Updates on Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoids: Progress and Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Temozolomide (TMZ) in the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme-A Literature Review and Clinical Outcomes.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Article
- Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Signaling Pathways and Epigenetic Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temozolomide (TEM) as a single agent or in combination with capecitabine (CAPTEM) is active in well-differentiated advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of gastro-entero-pancreatic and thoracic origin. The predictive role of MGMT-promoter methylation in this setting is controversial. We sought to prospectively evaluate the MGMT-promoter methylation status ability to predict outcomes to TEM-based chemotherapy in patients with NET. A single-center, prospective, observational study has been conducted at the ENETS Center-of-Excellence Outpatient Clinic of the IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi in Bologna, Italy. Patients with advanced, gastro-entero-pancreatic or lung well-differentiated NETs candidate to TEM-based chemotherapy and with available tumor samples for MGMT-promoter methylation assessment were included. The MGMT-promoter methylation status was analyzed by using pyrosequencing. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by the MGMT-promoter methylation status. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Survival outcomes were compared by restricted mean survival time (RMST) difference. Of 26 screened patients, 22 were finally enrolled in the study. The most frequent NET primary sites were the pancreas (64%) and the lung (23%). MGMT promoter was methylated in five tumors (23%). At a median follow-up time of 47.2 months (95%CI 29.3-89.7), the median PFS was 32.8 months (95%CI 17.2-NA), while the median OS was not reached. Patients in the methylated MGMT group, when compared to those in the unmethylated MGMT group, had longer PFS (median not reached [95%CI NA-NA] vs. 30.2 months [95%CI 15.2-NA], respectively; RMST
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.