Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36825901›Full record

ReviewImmunology and cell biology2023

T-cell activation-induced marker assays in health and disease.

Chad Poloni, Cole Schonhofer, Sabine Ivison, Megan K Levings, Theodore S Steiner, Laura Cook

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology and cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Preclinical Characterization of CLSP-1025, a First-in-Class, Mutation-Specific T-Cell Engager Targeting a Neoantigen Derived from a Common p53 Mutation.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chad PoloniDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Cole SchonhoferDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sabine IvisonBC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Megan K LevingsBC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Theodore S Steiner *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Laura Cook *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3153-2045

Funding

BC Children's Hospital Scientist Salary AwardNational Health and Medical Research Council 2009339University of British Columbia 4YF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation-induced marker (AIM) assays have proven to be an accessible and rapid means of antigen-specific T-cell detection. The method typically involves short-term incubation of whole blood or peripheral blood mononuclear cells with antigens of interest, where autologous antigen-presenting cells process and present peptides in complex with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Recognition of peptide-MHC complexes by T-cell receptors then induces upregulation of activation markers on the T cells that can be detected by flow cytometry. In this review, we highlight the most widely used activation markers for assays in the literature while identifying nuances and potential downfalls associated with the technique. We provide a summary of how AIM assays have been used in both discovery science and clinical studies, including studies of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunity. This review primarily focuses on AIM assays using human blood or peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples, with some considerations noted for tissue-derived T cells and nonhuman samples. AIM assays are a powerful tool that enables detailed analysis of antigen-specific T-cell frequency, phenotype and function without needing to know the precise antigenic peptides and their MHC restriction elements, enabling a wider analysis of immunity generated following infection and/or vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19Leukocytes, MononuclearAntigensHumansPeptidesSARS-CoV-2T-LymphocytesAntigensPeptidesAIMantigen-specific responseCD4+ T cellsflow cytometry

Identifiers

PMID36825901
PMCPMC10952637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.