Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36825824›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2023

Characteristics of patients initiating treatment with baricitinib and outcomes at follow-up: analysis of BSRBR-RA Registry data.

Christopher J Edwards, Julie Mount, Alexandra Meeks, Tania Gulati, Liliana Zaremba-Pechmann, Mohamed Sheesh, Esbjörn Larsson, Elaine Dennison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher J EdwardsNIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8233-6602
Julie MountEli Lilly and Company Limited, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.
Alexandra MeeksEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Tania GulatiEli Lilly and Company (India) Pvt. Ltd, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Liliana Zaremba-PechmannHaaPACS GmbH, Schriesheim, Germany.
Mohamed SheeshEli Lilly and Company Limited, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.
Esbjörn LarssonEli Lilly Sweden AB, Solna, Sweden.
Elaine DennisonFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2Versus Arthritis 19583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe selected baseline characteristics, continuation with baricitinib and disease activity over time in patients initiating treatment with baricitinib in a UK real-world rheumatology setting.

methodsBaseline and follow-up data were analysed from baricitinib-treated patients newly recruited to the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Registry-RA (BSRBR-RA) baricitinib cohort between 1 January 2018 and 31 March 2020. The primary objective was to evaluate continuation of baricitinib treatment in patients with at least one follow-up. Analyses were performed using the full baricitinib cohort, overall and by patient subgroup: biologic DMARD (bDMARD)/targeted synthetic (ts)DMARD-naive vs -experienced, baricitinib 4 vs 2 mg, age ≥65 vs <65 years, monotherapy vs combination therapy and male vs female.

resultsAt baseline, the study cohort (n = 561) was 76.5% female, mean age 60.0 years, had longstanding (mean 13.1 years) and severe RA, and 54.0% had previously received a bDMARD/tsDMARD. Of 265 and 110 patients completing the 6- and 12-month follow-ups with available data, 77.7 and 69.1% remained on baricitinib at each time, respectively. In all Kaplan-Meier analyses, >60% of patients remained on baricitinib at 540 days. Continuation of baricitinib therapy differed between some subgroup pairs (bDMARD/tsDMARD naive/experienced, baricitinib 2 mg/4 mg). Disease activity was lower at both follow-ups than at baseline, overall and in all subgroups.

conclusionIn the early years of real-world baricitinib use in the UK, a high proportion of patients continued with treatment at both 6 and 12 months, at which times disease activity was lower than at baseline.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsAgedAzetidinesBiological FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPurinesPyrazolesRoutinely Collected Health DataSulfonamidesTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsAzetidinesbaricitinibBiological FactorsBiological ProductsPurinesPyrazolesSulfonamidesbaricitinibJanus kinase inhibitorobservational studyRAreal-worldregistry

Identifiers

PMID36825824
PMCPMC10547529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.