Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36825777›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2023

Productive and physiological responses of feedlot cattle receiving different sources of Ca salts of fatty acids in the finishing diet.

Reinaldo F Cooke, Eduardo A Colombo, Shea J Mackey, Autumn T Pickett, Luiz Fernando D Batista, Ky G Pohler, Osvaldo A de Souza, Bruno I Cappellozza, Alice P Brandão

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inclusion ofTranslational animal science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Reinaldo F CookeDepartment of Animal Science - Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7497-3601
Eduardo A ColomboDepartment of Animal Science - Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8589-010X
Shea J MackeyDepartment of Animal Science - Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Autumn T PickettDepartment of Animal Science - Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Luiz Fernando D BatistaDepartment of Animal Science - Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7345-4703
Ky G PohlerDepartment of Animal Science - Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2429-0893
Osvaldo A de SouzaFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP 18618-970, Brazil.
Bruno I CappellozzaChr. Hansen A/S, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1819-4013
Alice P BrandãoDepartment of Animal Science - Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Texas A&M University · USChr. Hansen (Denmark) · DKUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

CAPES - Brazil 88881.128327/2016-01Nutricorp
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated productive and physiological responses in feedlot cattle receiving a finishing diet that included Ca salts of palm oil (CSPALM), or a blend of Ca salts of palm, cottonseed, and soybean oils (CSMIX). Ninety yearling steers were housed in 15 pens equipped with Calan-gate feeders (6 steers/pen). Steers within each pen were stratified by shrunk body weight (BW; 410 ± 3.3 kg across pens) on d 0 and assigned to receive a total-mixed ration (TMR) containing (dry matter basis) 2.2% of CSPALM (n = 30), 2.2% of CSMIX (n = 30), or no supplemental fat (CON; n = 30). Individual TMR intake was evaluated weekly. Blood samples were collected on d 0, 28, 56, 91, 119, and 147. Samples of the Longissimus muscle (LM) were collected on d 84 via biopsy. Upon slaughter on d 148, hot carcass weight (HCW) was recorded to estimate final BW (63% dressing), and one LM steak sample (2.54 cm thickness) was removed from the right side of each carcass. Steer ADG was greater (P = 0.02) for CSMIX compared with CSPALM and tended to be greater (P = 0.09) for CSMIX compared with CON. The gain:feed ratio was greater (P ≤ 0.05) for CSMIX compared with CSPALM and CON, and carcass LM area was less (P = 0.01) for CSPALM compared with CSMIX and CON. No treatment effects were detected (P ≥ 0.21) for TMR intake, final BW, and other carcass merit traits including marbling. Mean plasma cholesterol concentrations were greater (P < 0.01) in CSMIX and CSPALM compared with CON, and mRNA expression of adipocyte fatty acid binding protein in the LM on d 84 was greater (P ≤ 0.04) in CSPALM compared with CSMIX and CON. No treatment effects were detected (P ≥ 0.15) for plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin, insulin-like growth factor I, and leptin, nor for other LM genes associated with marbling and muscle growth. Concentrations of total fatty acids (FA) in plasma and LM steak samples were greater (P < 0.01) in CSMIX compared with CSPALM and CON, and greater (P < 0.01) in the LM samples of CSPALM compared with CON. Steers receiving CSMIX had greater (P < 0.01) concentrations of polyunsaturated and ω-6 FA in plasma and LM steak samples compared with CSPALM and CON. Supplementing CSMIX improved gain efficiency and FA profile in the LM of feedlot steers compared with the CON diet, but the same responses were not observed when CSPALM was offered. Perhaps the advantages from CSMIX supplementation resulted from increasing the supply of polyunsaturated and ω-6 FA to the finishing diet.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsSaltsAnimal FeedAnimalsBody CompositionCattleDietFatty AcidsFatty AcidsSaltscarcassCa salts of fatty acidsfeedlot cattleperformancephysiology

Identifiers

PMID36825777
PMCPMC9951263
OpenAlexW4321748629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.