ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2023
Analysis of the Curative Effect of Curved Angle Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of curved vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty versus unipedicular vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Assisted by a Curved Cement Delivery Guide for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures in the Elderly.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Refracture and Mortality Following Surgical Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Patient-Level Survival Modeling.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture of the thoracolumbar spine. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 113 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compressive fractures (OVCFs) in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2020, a total of 120 diseased vertebrae, were divided into PCVP group (35 cases, 37 sections) and bilateral PVP(BVP) group (78 cases, 83 sections). To compare the distribution of baseline clinical data, pain relief (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), ODI (Oswestry Dability Index, ODI), operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy, postoperative vertebral body re-fracture, and comparison of bone, and to compare the volume of cement penetration and the leakage rate of bone cement, etc. Results: There was no significant difference in VAS and ODI before operation between the two groups ( Conclusion: Both PCVP and bilateral PVP are safe and effective methods for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, but PCVP has a short operation time, fewer fluoroscopy times, and a low bone cement leakage rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.