Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36825140›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Solidarity and strife after the Atlanta spa shootings: A mixed methods study characterizing Twitter discussions by qualitative analysis and machine learning.

Shaniece Criss, Thu T Nguyen, Eli K Michaels, Gilbert C Gee, Mathew V Kiang, Quynh C Nguyen, Samantha Norton, Eli Titherington, Leah Nguyen, Isha Yardi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. The Association Between Racial Microaggressions and Stereotypes and Self-Rated Mental Health in Asian Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shaniece CrissDepartment of Health Sciences, Furman University, Greenville, SC, United States.
Thu T NguyenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, United States.
Eli K MichaelsDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Gilbert C GeeDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Mathew V KiangDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Quynh C NguyenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, United States.
Samantha NortonDepartment of Health Sciences, Furman University, Greenville, SC, United States.
Eli TitheringtonDepartment of Health Sciences, Furman University, Greenville, SC, United States.
Leah NguyenDepartment of Public Health Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Isha YardiDepartment of Public Health Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Melanie KimDepartment of Anthropology, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Nhung ThaiDepartment of Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Ariel ShepherdCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.
Chris J KennedyDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Martha Jane Bailey · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
Risk and strength: determining the impact of area-level sentiment and protective factors on birth outcomesR01MD015716 · NIMHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI NGUYEN, THU · 2021 to 2025
$3.6M
Rosie the Chatbot: Leveraging Automated and Personalized Health Information Communication to Reduce Disparities in Maternal and Child HealthR01MD016037 · NIMHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI NGUYEN, THU, NORELL, ELIZABETH MARIE · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Neighborhood Looking Glass: 360 Degree Automated Characterization of the Built Environment for Neighborhood Effects ResearchR01LM012849 · NLM · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI NGUYEN, QUYNH · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
Reducing racial disparities in the treatment of opioid use disorder using machine learning-based causal analysisR00DA051534 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KIANG, MATHEW VINHHOA · 2022 to 2024
$747k
Place-level discrimination and birth outcomesR00MD012615 · NIMHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI NGUYEN, THU · 2020 to 2022
$720k
COLLECTIVE RACIAL BIAS AND CARDIOVASCULAR RISK AMONG BLACK AND WHITE US ADULTSF31HL151284 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MICHAELS, ELI · 2020 to 2022
$100k
NHLBI NIH HHS F31 HL151284NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA051534NIMHD NIH HHS R00 MD012615NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD015716NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD016037NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: On March 16, 2021, a white man shot and killed eight victims, six of whom were Asian women at Atlanta-area spa and massage parlors. The aims of the study were to: (1) qualitatively summarize themes of tweets related to race, ethnicity, and racism immediately following the Atlanta spa shootings, and (2) examine temporal trends in expressions hate speech and solidarity before and after the Atlanta spa shootings using a new methodology for hate speech analysis. Methods: A random 1% sample of publicly available tweets was collected from January to April 2021. The analytic sample included 708,933 tweets using race-related keywords. This sample was analyzed for hate speech using a newly developed method for combining faceted item response theory with deep learning to measure a continuum of hate speech, from solidarity race-related speech to use of violent, racist language. A qualitative content analysis was conducted on random samples of 1,000 tweets referencing Asians before the Atlanta spa shootings from January to March 15, 2021 and 2,000 tweets referencing Asians after the shooting from March 17 to 28 to capture the immediate reactions and discussions following the shootings. Results: Qualitative themes that emerged included solidarity (4% before the shootings vs. 17% after), condemnation of the shootings (9% after), racism (10% before vs. 18% after), role of racist language during the pandemic (2 vs. 6%), intersectional vulnerabilities (4 vs. 6%), relationship between Asian and Black struggles against racism (5 vs. 7%), and discussions not related (74 vs. 37%). The quantitative hate speech model showed a decrease in the proportion of tweets referencing Asians that expressed racism (from 1.4% 7 days prior to the event from to 1.0% in the 3 days after). The percent of tweets referencing Asians that expressed solidarity speech increased by 20% (from 22.7 to 27.2% during the same time period) ( Discussion: Our analysis highlights some complexities of discrimination and the importance of nuanced evaluation of online speech. Findings suggest the importance of tracking hate and solidarity speech. By understanding the conversations emerging from social media, we may learn about possible ways to produce solidarity promoting messages and dampen hate messages.

Indexed as

Social MediaEthnicityFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleanti-Asian racismmachine learningqualitative content analysissolidarityTwitter

Identifiers

PMID36825140
PMCPMC9941551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.