Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36825116›Full record

ArticleGeoHealth2023

Wet Bulb Globe Temperature: Indicating Extreme Heat Risk on a Global Grid.

Chloe Brimicombe, Chun Hay Brian Lo, Florian Pappenberger, Claudia Di Napoli, Pedro Maciel, Tiago Quintino, Rosalind Cornforth, Hannah L Cloke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeoHealth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Racial and Economic Disparities in High-Temperature Exposure in Brazil.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chloe BrimicombeDepartment of Geography and Environmental Science University of Reading Reading UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5550-1556
Chun Hay Brian LoDepartment of Meteorology University of Reading Reading UK.
Florian PappenbergerEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reading UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1766-2898
Claudia Di NapoliDepartment of Geography and Environmental Science University of Reading Reading UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4901-3641
Pedro MacielEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reading UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2834-2208
Tiago QuintinoEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reading UK.
Rosalind CornforthWalker Institute University of Reading Reading UK.
Hannah L ClokeDepartment of Geography and Environmental Science University of Reading Reading UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1472-868X

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) is an international standard heat index used by the health, industrial, sports, and climate sectors to assess thermal comfort during heat extremes. Observations of its components, the globe and the wet bulb temperature (WBT), are however sparse. Therefore WBGT is difficult to derive, making it common to rely on approximations, such as the ones developed by Liljegren et al. (2008, https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620802310770,

Indexed as

climate change and healthheat stressheatwavesmean radiant temperaturenumerical weather predictionWBGT

Identifiers

PMID36825116
PMCPMC9941479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.