ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023
Retinal layer and fluid segmentation in optical coherence tomography images using a hierarchical framework.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical application of automated optical coherence tomography angiography for retinal fluid segmentation: a study of real-world data.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Human versus Artificial Intelligence: Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Retinal Layer and Fluid Segmentation in Optical Coherence Tomography Images from Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The development of accurate methods for retinal layer and fluid segmentation in optical coherence tomography images can help the ophthalmologists in the diagnosis and follow-up of retinal diseases. Recent works based on joint segmentation presented good results for the segmentation of most retinal layers, but the fluid segmentation results are still not satisfactory. We report a hierarchical framework that starts by distinguishing the retinal zone from the background, then separates the fluid-filled regions from the rest, and finally, discriminates the several retinal layers. Approach: Three fully convolutional networks were trained sequentially. The weighting scheme used for computing the loss function during training is derived from the outputs of the networks trained previously. To reinforce the relative position between retinal layers, the mutex Dice loss (included for optimizing the last network) was further modified so that errors between more "distant" layers are more penalized. The method's performance was evaluated using a public dataset. Results: The proposed hierarchical approach outperforms previous works in the segmentation of the inner segment ellipsoid layer and fluid (Dice coefficient = 0.95 and 0.82, respectively). The results achieved for the remaining layers are at a state-of-the-art level. Conclusions: The proposed framework led to significant improvements in fluid segmentation, without compromising the results in the retinal layers. Thus, its output can be used by ophthalmologists as a second opinion or as input for automatic extraction of relevant quantitative biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.