Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36825043›Full record

ReviewMovement disorders clinical practice2023

Intermittent Apomorphine Use for off Period Rescue in Parkinson's Disease: A Pragmatic Review of over Three Decades of Clinical Experience.

Sergio A Castillo-Torres, Andrew J Lees, Marcelo Merello

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. On-demand therapies-emergency medication or daily routine?Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Research progress on intranasal treatment for Parkinson's disease.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2024
    Review
  7. Apomorphine at the End-of-Life-A Role to Play.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Expert Consensus on the Use ofMovement disorders clinical practice · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Initiating Apomorphine Therapy Without Antiemetic Pretreatment: Real-World Data From a Nurse-led Parkinson Disease Support Program.The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Sergio A Castillo-TorresEdmond J. Safra Fellowship in Movement Disorders at Servicio de Movimientos Anormales, Departamento de Neurología Fleni Buenos Aires Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4727-2535
Andrew J LeesDepartment of Clinical Movement Disorder and Neuroscience University College London, Institute of Neurology, Reta Lila Weston Institute of Neurological Studies London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2476-4385
Marcelo MerelloEdmond J. Safra Fellowship in Movement Disorders at Servicio de Movimientos Anormales, Departamento de Neurología Fleni Buenos Aires Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6898-7823
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARThe Neurological Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although proven very efficacious as treatment for Parkinson's disease by Schwab as far back as the 1950s, and later confirmed by Cotzias and colleagues in the early 1970s, use of intermittent subcutaneous injections of the dopamine agonist apomorphine remains limited worldwide. Objectives: To review evidence regarding use of intermittent, on-demand apomorphine as a treatment for off-period disability in Parkinson's disease. Methods: A PRISMA-compliant structured literature search was carried out with a focus on clinical effect (motor improvement, daily off time decrease; latency, duration), antiemetic prophylaxis, and adverse events. Results: Fifty-eight studies were evaluated. Apomorphine administration route was subcutaneous in 29 (50%), sublingual in 14 (24.1%), intranasal in 6 (10.3%), inhaled in 5 (8.6%), rectal in 3 (5.2%) and transdermal in 1 (1.7%). Irrespective of the route, motor disability improved 19% to 74% and daily off time decreased 3% to 68%, with subcutaneous having the fastest onset of action ranging from 6 to 24 minutes and lasting 28 to 96 minutes. Antiemetic prophylaxis was used in almost all studies. Systemic side effects like nausea and yawning were mild and well tolerated, but sedation led to discontinuation of subcutaneous apomorphine in 5.5%. Local side effects to subcutaneous administration did not result in discontinuation. Stomatitis with the early sublingual formulations led to discontinuation in nearly half of patients and was reduced to 16.7% with novel film strips. Conclusions: Intermittent subcutaneous injections remain the most reliable and safest route of apomorphine administration, with an efficacy for off period treatment supported by nearly four decades of clinical experience.

Indexed as

apomorphinemotor fluctuationsoff periodParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID36825043
PMCPMC9941929
OpenAlexW4303987086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.