ReviewMovement disorders clinical practice2023
Intermittent Apomorphine Use for off Period Rescue in Parkinson's Disease: A Pragmatic Review of over Three Decades of Clinical Experience.
Review in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- On-demand therapies-emergency medication or daily routine?Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Versatile and sensitive dual-detection HPLC method for rapid quantification of apomorphine hydrochloride: application to ex vivo percutaneous permeation and deposition studies utilising novel transdermal pressure-sensitive adhesive patches.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Spectrum of Intermittent Apomorphine in Parkinson's Disease: Neuropsychiatric, Behavioral, and Cognitive Analyses.Noro psikiyatri arsivi · 2026Article
- Use of and Barriers to Subcutaneous Apomorphine Pen Injections in Parkinson's Disease: A Survey by the French NS-PARK Network.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- Pharmacotherapy of motor symptoms in early and mid-stage Parkinson's disease: guideline "Parkinson's disease" of the German Society of Neurology.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Research progress on intranasal treatment for Parkinson's disease.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2024Review
- Apomorphine at the End-of-Life-A Role to Play.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2023Article
- Adopting the Rumsfeld approach to understanding the action of levodopa and apomorphine in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2023Review
- Expert Consensus on the Use ofMovement disorders clinical practice · 2023Article
- Drugs to the Rescue: Comparison of On-Demand Therapies for OFF Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2023Review
- Initiating Apomorphine Therapy Without Antiemetic Pretreatment: Real-World Data From a Nurse-led Parkinson Disease Support Program.The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience NursesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although proven very efficacious as treatment for Parkinson's disease by Schwab as far back as the 1950s, and later confirmed by Cotzias and colleagues in the early 1970s, use of intermittent subcutaneous injections of the dopamine agonist apomorphine remains limited worldwide. Objectives: To review evidence regarding use of intermittent, on-demand apomorphine as a treatment for off-period disability in Parkinson's disease. Methods: A PRISMA-compliant structured literature search was carried out with a focus on clinical effect (motor improvement, daily off time decrease; latency, duration), antiemetic prophylaxis, and adverse events. Results: Fifty-eight studies were evaluated. Apomorphine administration route was subcutaneous in 29 (50%), sublingual in 14 (24.1%), intranasal in 6 (10.3%), inhaled in 5 (8.6%), rectal in 3 (5.2%) and transdermal in 1 (1.7%). Irrespective of the route, motor disability improved 19% to 74% and daily off time decreased 3% to 68%, with subcutaneous having the fastest onset of action ranging from 6 to 24 minutes and lasting 28 to 96 minutes. Antiemetic prophylaxis was used in almost all studies. Systemic side effects like nausea and yawning were mild and well tolerated, but sedation led to discontinuation of subcutaneous apomorphine in 5.5%. Local side effects to subcutaneous administration did not result in discontinuation. Stomatitis with the early sublingual formulations led to discontinuation in nearly half of patients and was reduced to 16.7% with novel film strips. Conclusions: Intermittent subcutaneous injections remain the most reliable and safest route of apomorphine administration, with an efficacy for off period treatment supported by nearly four decades of clinical experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.