Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36824670›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Preventing, reducing, and attenuating restraint: A prospective controlled trial of the implementation of peer support in acute psychiatry.

Julia Badouin, Andreas Bechdolf, Felix Bermpohl, Johanna Baumgardt, Stefan Weinmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Peer support in acute outreach psychiatric crisis interventions: results of a qualitative study].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Article
  4. Peer support in acute psychiatric inpatient settings: A scoping review.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia BadouinDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Vivantes Hospital Am Urban, Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Academic Hospital, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas BechdolfDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Vivantes Hospital Am Urban, Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Academic Hospital, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Felix BermpohlDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Charité Campus Mitte Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Johanna BaumgardtDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Vivantes Hospital Am Urban, Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Academic Hospital, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan WeinmannDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Vivantes Hospital Am Urban, Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Academic Hospital, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The use of restraint as a means of managing patients is considered a critical factor that interferes with recovery. Strategies to create a less restrictive environment within psychiatric facilities are therefore eagerly sought. Peer support workers (PSWs) are increasingly employed in mental health settings. The prevailing theory is that PSWs have the potential to contribute to conflict and restraint prevention efforts in acute psychiatric wards. However, to date, research in support of this claim remains limited. Objective: The present study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of employing peer support workers with regard to reducing the use of restraint. Methods: This prospective controlled pre-post study sought to evaluate the implementation of peer support in one locked ward compared to treatment as usual (TAU) with no implementation of peer support in a second locked ward of a psychiatry department in Berlin, Germany. The pre-post comparison was planned to consist of two assessment periods of 3 months each, taking place directly before and after peer support implementation or TAU. Both assessments were extended to a period of 6 months, before and after the initially planned 12-month implementation process, in order to balance the effects of disruptions and of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using routine data, the proportion, frequency, and duration of mechanical restraint, forced medication as well as mechanical restraint in combination with forced medication, were evaluated. Results: In the control group, an increase in the proportion of patients subjected to measures of restraint was found between pre- and post-assessment, which was accompanied by a further increase in the mean number of events of restraint per patient within this group. In the intervention group, no significant change in the application of restraint was observed during the study period. Discussion: There is some indication that peer support may be protective with regard to restraint in acute wards. However, our study faced major challenges during the implementation process and the post-assessment period, such as COVID-19 and staff reorganization. This may have led to peer support not reaching its full potential. The relationship between the implementation of peer support and the use of restraint therefore merits further investigation.

Indexed as

acute psychiatric carepeer supportpredictorrecoveryrestraint

Identifiers

PMID36824670
PMCPMC9941159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.