ArticleActa clinica Croatica2022
CONVERSION RATE OF EPIDURAL ANALGESIA TO CAESAREAN SECTION REGIONAL OR GENERAL ANESTHESIA.
Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction and Validation of a Prediction Model for Conversion to Cesarean Section in Primiparous Women Receiving Epidural Labor Analgesia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Intracranial hemorrhage following spinal interventions: A comparison between major surgical procedures versus minimally invasive procedures.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Epidural analgesia is acknowledged as the most common method of analgesia during labor. If emergent Caesarean section (CS) is indicated in parturient with existing labor epidural, the need for conversion from epidural analgesia to regional (RA) or general anesthesia (GA) increases accordingly. Recent guidelines suggest the rate of conversion to general anesthesia shows the quality of obstetric anesthesia care and should be under 5%. The aim: The aim of this study is to determine the conversion rate from epidural analgesia to Caesarean section anesthesia in "Sveti Duh" University Hospital Zagreb in order to enhance the quality of anesthetic care for obstetric patients. Methods: We retrospectively included in the study all parturients who received epidural labor analgesia but needed subsequent regional or general anesthesia for Caesarean section in our institution for the period of 1st January 2021 to 31st December 2021. After the data analysis on the conversion rate from epidural analgesia to Caesarean section anesthesia had been performed, we compared our data to current standards and relevant literature findings. Results: Altogether 1202 epidural catheters were placed for labor analgesia in the study period, and in 199 of these cases, the emergent Caesarean section was indicated. Epidural analgesia was converted to epidural anesthesia (EA) in 153 (76,9%) parturients, to general anesthesia in 40 (20,1%), and to spinal anesthesia (SA) in six (3%) parturients. After comparison with recommended quality standards and with the results of similar studies by other authors, our findings show a significantly higher rate of conversion from epidural analgesia to general anesthesia than has been desirable since then. Conclusion: In order to reach the required quality standards regarding the conversion rate from epidural analgesia to Caesarean section anesthesia, it is necessary to improve the organization of the work of the obstetric anesthesiology team according to the principle of subspecialization. It is imperative to implement the best clinical practice protocols for obstetric anesthesiologists, but also to enhance the communication and coordination with the obstetric team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.