Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36824524›Full record

ArticleGigaByte (Hong Kong, China)2022

Chromosome-level assembly of the common vetch

Hangwei Xi, Vy Nguyen, Christopher Ward, Zhipeng Liu, Iain R Searle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaByte (Hong Kong, China), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CombiningPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Forage Crop Research in the Modern Age.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Chromosome-level assembly of the common vetchGigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hangwei XiSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1840-2556
Vy NguyenSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7369-7457
Christopher WardSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0227-0189
Zhipeng LiuState Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, No 768 Jiayuguan West Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730020, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7687-8256
Iain R SearleSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4306-9756
The University of Adelaide · AULanzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID36824524
PMCPMC9650280
OpenAlexW4210322124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.