ReviewFrontiers in physiology2023
Selection of patients with symptomatic vagal-induced sinus node dysfunction: Who will be the best candidate for cardioneuroablation?
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardioneuroablation in a young patient with sinus node dysfunction secondary to cardiotoxicity in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.HeartRhythm case reports · 2026Article
- Effects of cardioneuroablation for vasovagal syncope: ganglionated plexus localization by tentative anatomical ablation and high-frequency electrical stimulation.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Cardiac Geometry and Function in Patients with Reflex Syncope.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Safety and efficacy of cardioneuroablation for vagal bradycardia in a single arm prospective study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The role of P21-activated kinase (Pak1) in sinus node function.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sinus node dysfunction is a multifaceted disorder with variable manifestations, the prevalence of which increases with age. In a specific group of patients, excessive vagal activity may be the sole cause for this condition. These patients are characterized as having recurrent daytime symptoms attributed to bradyarrhythmia, no evidence of organic sinus node lesions, cardiac vagal overactivation, and are non-elderly. For sinus node dysfunction patients, a permanent pacemaker implantation appears to be the ultimate solution, although it is not an etiological treatment. Cardioneuroablation is a promising emerging therapy that can fundamentally eliminate symptoms in a highly selective sub-set of sinus node dysfunction patients by cardiac vagal nerve denervation. Denervation with ablation for vagal-induced sinus node dysfunction can effectively improve sinus bradycardia and reduce syncope. To date, guidelines for selection of suitable candidates for cardioneuroablation remain lacking. The primary objective of this study was to distinguish the nature of abnormal sinus node function and to find methods for quantifying vagal tone. Clear selection criteria could help physicians in identification of patients with autonomic imbalance, thereby maximizing patient benefits and the success rate of cardioneuroablations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.