ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
Deep learning-based end-to-end automated stenosis classification and localization on catheter coronary angiography.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of deep learning in the differential diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2024Pooled it
- Introduction and validation of OSCAR-optimal stent choice algorithm.CVIR endovascular · 2026Article
- An Imaging Informatics Workflow for Angiography-Derived Coronary Physiology Profiling and Virtual PCI Simulation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- From intravascular imaging to adaptive vascular care: intelligent photonics and digital twins in panvascular disease.Light, science & applications · 2026Review
- The current state of artificial intelligence-based invasive coronary angiography image analysis: a systematic review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence Powered Real-Time Coronary Stenosis Recognition and Quantification in Angiography.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Automatic diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis by deep learning based on X-ray coronary angiography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in coronary angiography: benchmarking the diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT-4o against interventional cardiologists.Open heart · 2025Article
- LT-YOLO: long-term temporal enhanced YOLO for stenosis detection on invasive coronary angiography.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- DCA-YOLOv8: A Novel Framework Combined with AICI Loss Function for Coronary Artery Stenosis Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- How AI and Robotics Will Advance Interventional Radiology: Narrative Review and Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- One-Stage Detection without Segmentation for Multi-Type Coronary Lesions in Angiography Images Using Deep Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Convolutional neural networks on risk stratification of patients with suspected coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Automatic coronary angiography (CAG) assessment may help in faster screening and diagnosis of stenosis in patients with atherosclerotic disease. We aimed to provide an end-to-end workflow that separates cases with normal or mild stenoses from those with higher stenosis severities to facilitate safety screening of a large volume of the CAG images. Methods: A deep learning-based end-to-end workflow was employed as follows: (1) Candidate frame selection from CAG videograms with Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) + Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) network, (2) Stenosis classification with Inception-v3 using 2 or 3 categories (<25%, >25%, and/or total occlusion) with and without redundancy training, and (3) Stenosis localization with two methods of class activation map (CAM) and anchor-based feature pyramid network (FPN). Overall 13,744 frames from 230 studies were used for the stenosis classification training and fourfold cross-validation for image-, artery-, and per-patient-level. For the stenosis localization training and fourfold cross-validation, 690 images with > 25% stenosis were used. Results: Our model achieved an accuracy of 0.85, sensitivity of 0.96, and AUC of 0.86 in per-patient level stenosis classification. Redundancy training was effective to improve classification performance. Stenosis position localization was adequate with better quantitative results in anchor-based FPN model, achieving global-sensitivity for left coronary artery (LCA) and right coronary artery (RCA) of 0.68 and 0.70. Conclusion: We demonstrated a fully automatic end-to-end deep learning-based workflow that eliminates the vessel extraction and segmentation step in coronary artery stenosis classification and localization on CAG images. This tool may be useful to facilitate safety screening in high-volume centers and in clinical trial settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.