Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36824452›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Deep learning-based end-to-end automated stenosis classification and localization on catheter coronary angiography.

Chao Cong, Yoko Kato, Henrique Doria De Vasconcellos, Mohammad R Ostovaneh, Joao A C Lima, Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chao CongDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Yoko KatoDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Henrique Doria De VasconcellosDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Mohammad R OstovanehDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Joao A C LimaDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Bharath Ambale-VenkateshDivision of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Johns Hopkins University · USChongqing University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Automatic coronary angiography (CAG) assessment may help in faster screening and diagnosis of stenosis in patients with atherosclerotic disease. We aimed to provide an end-to-end workflow that separates cases with normal or mild stenoses from those with higher stenosis severities to facilitate safety screening of a large volume of the CAG images. Methods: A deep learning-based end-to-end workflow was employed as follows: (1) Candidate frame selection from CAG videograms with Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) + Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) network, (2) Stenosis classification with Inception-v3 using 2 or 3 categories (<25%, >25%, and/or total occlusion) with and without redundancy training, and (3) Stenosis localization with two methods of class activation map (CAM) and anchor-based feature pyramid network (FPN). Overall 13,744 frames from 230 studies were used for the stenosis classification training and fourfold cross-validation for image-, artery-, and per-patient-level. For the stenosis localization training and fourfold cross-validation, 690 images with > 25% stenosis were used. Results: Our model achieved an accuracy of 0.85, sensitivity of 0.96, and AUC of 0.86 in per-patient level stenosis classification. Redundancy training was effective to improve classification performance. Stenosis position localization was adequate with better quantitative results in anchor-based FPN model, achieving global-sensitivity for left coronary artery (LCA) and right coronary artery (RCA) of 0.68 and 0.70. Conclusion: We demonstrated a fully automatic end-to-end deep learning-based workflow that eliminates the vessel extraction and segmentation step in coronary artery stenosis classification and localization on CAG images. This tool may be useful to facilitate safety screening in high-volume centers and in clinical trial settings.

Indexed as

catheter coronary angiographydeep learningend-to-end workflowredundancy trainingstenosis classificationstenosis localization

Identifiers

PMID36824452
PMCPMC9941145
OpenAlexW4319444181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.