Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36824342›Full record

ArticleGigaByte (Hong Kong, China)2021

Optimizing experimental design for genome sequencing and assembly with Oxford Nanopore Technologies.

John M Sutton, Joshua D Millwood, A Case McCormack, Janna L Fierst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaByte (Hong Kong, China), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Forward Genetic Screen inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John M SuttonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0344, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3559-389X
Joshua D MillwoodDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0344, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8477-4203
A Case McCormackDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0344, USA.
Janna L FierstDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0344, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3639-8829
University of Alabama · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High quality reference genome sequences are the core of modern genomics. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) produces inexpensive DNA sequences, but has high error rates, which make sequence assembly and analysis difficult as genome size and complexity increases. Robust experimental design is necessary for ONT genome sequencing and assembly, but few studies have addressed eukaryotic organisms. Here, we present novel results using simulated and empirical ONT and DNA libraries to identify best practices for sequencing and assembly for several model species. We find that the unique error structure of ONT libraries causes errors to accumulate and assembly statistics plateau as sequence depth increases. High-quality assembled eukaryotic sequences require high-molecular-weight DNA extractions that increase sequence read length, and computational protocols that reduce error through pre-assembly correction and read selection. Our quantitative results will be helpful for researchers seeking guidance for

Identifiers

PMID36824342
PMCPMC9650304
OpenAlexW4253917380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.