ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023
LncCat: An ORF attention model to identify LncRNA based on ensemble learning strategy and fused sequence information.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- HyLnc: a hybrid deep learning and feature-based approach for long non-coding RNA prediction.RNA biology · 2026Article
- Advancing bioinformatics with language models: components, applications, and perspectives.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Microproteins in Metabolic Biology: Emerging Functions and Potential Roles as Nutrient-Linked Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Beyond digital twins: the role of foundation models in enhancing the interpretability of multiomics modalities in precision medicine.FEBS open bio · 2025Review
- Review
- Application of artificial intelligence large language models in drug target discovery.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Multimodal Large Language Models in Health Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Outlook.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- LncRNA-encoded peptides in cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Review
- Challenges in LncRNA Biology: Views and Opinions.Non-coding RNA · 2024Article
- Non-Coding RNA-Mediated Gene Regulation in Cardiovascular Disorders: Current Insights and Future Directions.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2024Review
- Localization is the key to action: regulatory peculiarities of lncRNAs.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) is one of the most essential forms of transcripts, playing crucial regulatory roles in the development of cancers and diseases without protein-coding ability. It was assumed that short ORFs (sORFs) in lncRNA were weak to translate proteins. However, recent research has shown that sORFs can encode peptides, which increases the difficulty to identify lncRNA. Therefore, identifying lncRNAs with sORFs facilitates finding novel regulatory factors. Results: In this paper, we propose LncCat for identifying lncRNA based on category boosting (CatBoost) and ORF-attention features. LncCat combines five types of features to encode transcript sequences and employs CatBoost to build a prediction model. In addition, the visualization comparison reveals that the ORF-attention features between lncRNAs and protein-coding transcripts are significantly distinct. The comparison results show that LncCat outperforms competing methods on several benchmark datasets. For Matthew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC), LncCat achieves 0.9503, 0.9219, 0.8591, 0.8672, and 0.9047 on the human, mouse, zebrafish, wheat, and chicken datasets, with improvements ranging from 1.90% to 7.82%, 1.49-17.63%, 6.11-21.50%, 3.02-51.64% and 5.35-26.90%, respectively. Moreover, LncCat dramatically improves the MCC by at least 11.90%, 12.96% and 42.61% on sORF test datasets of human, mouse, and zebrafish, respectively. Conclusions: Experiments indicate that LncCat performs better both on long ORF and sORF datasets, and ORF-attention features show positive effects on predicting lncRNA. In brief, LncCat is a reliable method for identifying lncRNA. Additionally, a user-friendly web server is developed for academics at http://cczubio.top/lnccat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.