Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36824226›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2023

Utility of a risk assessment model in predicting 30 day unplanned hospital readmission in adult patients receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

Ethan Brenneman, Jason Funaro, Kristen Dicks, Michael Yarrington, Hui-Jie Lee, Alaattin Erkanli, Frances Hung, Richard Drew

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ethan BrennemanDepartment of Pharmacy, Duke University Hospital, 2301 Erwin Road Durham, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6553-8704
Jason FunaroDepartment of Pharmacy, Duke University Hospital, 2301 Erwin Road Durham, Durham, NC, USA.
Kristen DicksDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael YarringtonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Hui-Jie LeeBiostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Alaattin ErkanliBiostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Frances HungBiostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Richard DrewDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · USDuke University Hospital · USCampbell University · US

Funding

Support for QA/QC for Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002553 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JENNIFER S, MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 2018 to 2023
$58.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is associated with high hospital readmission rates. A 30 day unplanned readmission risk prediction model for OPAT patients has been developed in the UK. Given significant differences in patient mix and methods of OPAT delivery, we explored the model for its utility in Duke University Health System (DUHS) patients receiving OPAT. Methods: We analysed OPAT episodes of adult patients from two hospitals between 1 July 2019 and 1 February 2020. The discriminative ability of the model to predict 30 day unplanned all-cause and OPAT-related admission was examined. An updated model was created by logistic regression with the UK risk factors and additional risk factors, OPAT delivery in a skilled nursing facility, vancomycin use and IV drug abuse. Results: Compared with patients of the UK cohort, our study patients were of higher acuity, treated for more invasive infections, and received OPAT through different modes. The 30 day unplanned readmission rate in our cohort was 20% (94/470), with 59.5% (56/94) of those being OPAT-related. The original model was unable to discriminate for all-cause readmission with a C-statistic of 0.52 (95% CI 0.46-0.59) and for OPAT-related readmission with a C-statistic of 0.55 (95% CI 0.47-0.64). The updated model with additional risk factors did not have improved performance, with a C-statistic of 0.55 (95% CI 0.49-0.62). Conclusions: The UK 30 day unplanned hospital readmission model performed poorly in predicting readmission for the OPAT population at a US academic medical centre.

Identifiers

PMID36824226
PMCPMC9942543
OpenAlexW4321441670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.