ReviewFrontiers in plant science2023
Improving abiotic stress tolerance of forage grasses - prospects of using genome editing.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analyses Reveal Adaptive Mechanisms ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Spider Mite Response, Agronomic Performance, and Stability of aPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis reveals key genes and metabolites in common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) response to drought stress.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Abiotic stress responses in forage crops and grasses: the role of secondary metabolites and biotechnological interventions.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Isolation and transformation of perennial ryegrass (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Genetic Symphony: Harnessing CRISPR-Cas Genome Editing for Effective Insect Pest Management.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Italian Ryegrass as a Forage Crop for the Baltics: Opportunities and Challenges in Light of Climate Change.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Genetic modification strategies for enhancing plant resilience to abiotic stresses in the context of climate change.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to an increase in the consumption of food, feed, and fuel and to meet global food security needs for the rapidly growing human population, there is a necessity to obtain high-yielding crops that can adapt to future climate changes. Currently, the main feed source used for ruminant livestock production is forage grasses. In temperate climate zones, perennial grasses grown for feed are widely distributed and tend to suffer under unfavorable environmental conditions. Genome editing has been shown to be an effective tool for the development of abiotic stress-resistant plants. The highly versatile CRISPR-Cas system enables increasingly complex modifications in genomes while maintaining precision and low off-target frequency mutations. In this review, we provide an overview of forage grass species that have been subjected to genome editing. We offer a perspective view on the generation of plants resilient to abiotic stresses. Due to the broad factors contributing to these stresses the review focuses on drought, salt, heat, and cold stresses. The application of new genomic techniques (e.g., CRISPR-Cas) allows addressing several challenges caused by climate change and abiotic stresses for developing forage grass cultivars with improved adaptation to the future climatic conditions. Genome editing will contribute towards developing safe and sustainable food systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.