ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2023
Risk Evaluation of Bone Metastases and a Simple Tool for Detecting Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A seven-variable clinical prediction model for bone metastasis at initial diagnosis of prostate cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- The value of habitat analysis based onBMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Bone metastases from endocrine cancer: advances in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Extracellular Mechanical Stimuli Alters the Metastatic Progression of Prostate Cancer Cells within 3D Tissue Matrix.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Population-based estimates of the incidence and prognosis of bone metastases in prostate cancer (PC) are lacking. We aimed to characterize the incidence and risk of bone metastases and develop a simple tool for the prediction of bone metastases among patients with PC. Methods: Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A total of 75698 patients with PC with confirmed presence or absence of bone metastases at diagnosis between 1975 and 2019 in the United States were used for analysis. Data were stratified by age, race, residence, median income, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, tumor size, distant metastatic history, and positive lymph node scores. Multivariable logistic and Cox regressions were performed to identify predictors of bone metastases and factors correlated with all-cause mortality. Classification tree analysis was performed to establish a model. Results: After patients with PC with missing data were excluded, 75698 cases remained. Among these, 3835 patients had bone metastases. Incidence proportions were highest in patients with a high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value (odds ratio (OR), 2.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.35-4.35; Conclusion: Patients with PC with high PSA values or high positive lymph node scores were at a significantly higher risk of bone metastases. Our study may provide a simple and accurate tool to identify patients with PC at high risk of bone metastases based on population-based estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.