ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Primary spinal anaplastic ependymoma: A single-institute retrospective cohort and systematic review.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A rare case of intradural extramedullary anaplastic ependymoma: a 35-month survival update following resection and adjuvant proton beam radiation therapy. Illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Genetic Markers and Mutations in Primary Spinal Cord Tumors and Their Impact on Clinical Management.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Spinal ependymal tumors.Neuro-oncology advances · 2024Review
- Spinal ependymoma in adults: from molecular advances to new treatment perspectives.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Primary spinal anaplastic ependymoma (PSAE) is an extremely rare disease. We aim to report the largest PSAE cohort, evaluate the treatments, and investigate the prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: Clinical data collected from the authors' institute and literature articles were pooled and described. Survival analysis and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate therapies and investigate prognostic factors for PFS. Results: Our cohort included 22 females and 16 males, with a median age of 33 years. PSAE developed mostly on cervical and cervicothoracic levels. The median length measured 3 segments. Half of PSAE were intramedullary. Pain was the most common symptom. The median duration of symptoms was 6 months. Neurological statuses were improved in 76% following treatments, whereas clinical tumor progression occurred in 41.7%. The estimated median progression-free survival was 132 months, and the estimated median survival was 192 months. The median Ki-67 index was 15%. Patients aged less than or equal to 25 experienced worse neurological statuses and more repeated progression. Age less than or equal to 25 (HR 10.312, 95%CI 1.535-69.260, p=0.016), gross total resection (HR 0.116, 95%CI 0.020-0.688, p=0.018), and radiotherapy (HR 0.084, 95%CI 0.009-0.804, p=0.032) are three prognostic factors for tumor progression. Conclusion: Tumor progression remains a big concern in the clinical course of PSAE. Being aged above 25, undergoing GTR, and accepting adjuvant radiotherapy put patients at lower risk for tumor progression. Younger patients might have worse neurological statuses compared with those aged over 25.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.