Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36824112›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Silodosin as a medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Muhammad Zaniar Ramadhani, Yudhistira Pradnyan Kloping, Ilham Akbar Rahman, Niwanda Yogiswara, Mohammad Ayodhia Soebadi, Johan Renaldo

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad Zaniar RamadhaniDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Yudhistira Pradnyan KlopingDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Ilham Akbar RahmanDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Niwanda YogiswaraDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Mohammad Ayodhia SoebadiDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Johan RenaldoDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Airlangga University · IDUniversitas Dr. Soetomo · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tamsulosin is the most commonly used medical expulsive therapy (MET). However, it does not alleviate ureteral colic. It is important to develop MET that can reduce ureteral colic while maintaining a high stone clearance rate. Silodosin is an α1A adrenoceptor with high affinity and selectivity for the distal ureter, which may reduce ureteral colic and enable stone expulsion for distal ureteral stones. Therefore, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of silodosin as MET and its role in reducing ureteral colic among patients with distal ureteral stones. Materials and Methods: This research was conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review and Intervention, in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42021249003). A comprehensive literature search was performed in several databases including Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus up to July 2021 for randomized trials comparing silodosin with placebo for MET. RevMan 5.4 was used for data analysis. Results: A total of six randomized controlled trials were included in this analysis with a total of 907 patients. Our analysis revealed that the patients who received silodosin had significantly higher stone expulsion rate (SER) (odds ratio [OR] 3.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.34, 4.76, P < 0.01), significantly shorter stone expulsion time (SET) (mean difference -3.79, 95% CI -4.51, -3.06, P < 0.01), and lower analgesic use (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.23, 0.69, P < 0.01) compared to the group receiving placebo. Conclusion: Silodosin showed significantly higher SER, lower SET and lower analgesic use in patients with distal ureteral stones as compared to a placebo.

Identifiers

PMID36824112
PMCPMC9942217
OpenAlexW4321749383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.