ArticleInfection and drug resistance2023
Detection of
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developing a recombinase-aided amplification method combined with a lateral flow dipstick assay for rapid triplex detection of bovine coronavirus, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus, and bovine viral diarrhea virus.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Environmental intervention for two cases of non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Higher rates of diagnosis of pulmonary Methods: A total of 111 patients at our hospital with suspected MAC who underwent BS because they were sputum-negative from April 2018 to March 2022 were analyzed prospectively. These patients were also divided into two groups, anti-MAC Ab-positive and anti-MAC Ab-negative, and compared. Results: A total of 111 patients underwent BS, though 95 (38.0%) of 250 enrolled patients were sputum smear/culture-positive. The age of the 111 patients was 69.14 (31.0-89.0) years, and 90 (81.0%) were female; 69 (62.2%) of 111 patients were either smear-positive (n = 42, 37.8%) or culture-positive (n = 27, 24.3%) by BS. Of the total 111 patients, 69 (62.2%) were anti-MAC Ab-positive and 57 (82.6%) of 69 patients were also positive by BS. In contrast, only 12 (28.6%) of the 42 anti-MAC Ab-negative patients were positive by BS. The sensitivity and specificity of anti-MAC Ab for positive by BS were 82.6% and 71.4%, respectively, and the area under the curve (AUC) on receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was 0.807. Conclusion: BS and anti-MAC Ab showed similar usefulness to confirm the diagnosis in patients who could not be diagnosed by sputum examination, but pulmonary MAC disease was strongly suspected based on chest radiography/CT findings. These two examinations were correlated, and their combination appeared to provide more accurate diagnosis and earlier therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.