ArticleClinical kidney journal2022
Evaluating the impact of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy with tolvaptan to monitor liver safety in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- SGLT2 inhibitors in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: rationale, evidence gaps, and ongoing clinical trials.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Vaptans: A Narrative Review of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacogenetics, and Clinical Applications.Cells · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in rapidly progressing autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a single-center, prospective, single-arm study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Evolution of Clinical Trial Design in ADPKD.Kidney international reports · 2026Review
- Unravelling sex-specific differences in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a multiorgan perspective.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Review
- Real-World Tolvaptan Use in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Insights from Two US Medical Centers.Kidney360 · 2025Article
- Review
- Five years of post-marketing liver safety data from the tolvaptan Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Tolvaptan safety in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease; a focus on idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury liabilities.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025Review
- Liver safety of tolvaptan in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: interim data from a post-authorization safety study.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- What is the Appropriate Dose of Tolvaptan in ADPKD?Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- Tolvaptan and Number Needed to Harm in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.Kidney medicine · 2024Article
- Long-Term Effects of Tolvaptan in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Predictors of Treatment Response and Safety over 6 Years of Continuous Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: On approval of JYNARQUE (tolvaptan) for use in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) at risk for rapid progression, the US Food and Drug Administration required a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) from the sponsor, which includes collection of post marketing liver safety data. Methods: This is a retrospective interim analysis of the ongoing REMS. The period evaluated was from REMS implementation (14 May 2018) at tolvaptan commercialization to the analysis cutoff date (23 February 2021). Patients were previously tolvaptan-naïve and initiated tolvaptan in the post marketing setting. Reports of possible severe drug-induced liver injury (DILI) were evaluated for severity based on the evidence obtained (e.g. liver enzyme levels, symptoms, diagnostic tests and event outcomes). The incidence of DILI was compared between the REMS and tolvaptan clinical trials in ADPKD. Results: Among 6711 REMS patients, 60 (0.9%) cases of possible severe DILI were reported, 4 of which were confirmed as serious and potentially fatal by the sponsor. One of these four patients met Hy's law criteria. In all four patients, liver enzymes normalized after tolvaptan discontinuation. The duration of tolvaptan exposure in the REMS is currently shorter than in completed clinical trials, but within this limitation, the incidence of possible severe DILI was lower in the REMS than in clinical trials (incidence rate ratio 0.587; Conclusions: In interim data on >6000 tolvaptan REMS patients, <1% experienced possible severe DILI. Monthly monitoring, as described in the tolvaptan prescribing information, enables the prompt detection of liver enzyme abnormalities and appropriate drug discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.